The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Gemma 3 4B vs IBM Granite 4.2 30B

IBM Granite 4.2 30B leads the LLM Stats Score 24.0 to -1.6.

Google · IBM · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

IBM Granite 4.2 30B leads the overall LLM Stats Score 24.0 to -1.6, ranking #156 overall.

In the 3 individual benchmarks reported for both models, IBM Granite 4.2 30B wins 3; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Gemma 3 4B

  • you want predictable pricing at $0.02/M input and $0.04/M output

Choose IBM Granite 4.2 30B

  • overall performance matters — it scores 24.0 and ranks #156 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning and coding — it leads those capability indexes
  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 3 of 3 exact shared results
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Aug 2026

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Core performance indexes
-1.6
#320
24.0
#156
-2.6
#317
21.8
#165
-4.3
#241
9.6
#159
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
0 of 3
3 of 3
Input price
$0.02 / M
— / M
Output price
$0.04 / M
— / M
Context window
131,072

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

1 shared
Index
Gemma 3 4B
IBM Granite 4.2 30B
5.3#265
25.6#103
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

26 reported for Gemma 3 4B · 18 for IBM Granite 4.2 30B

3 shared

Gemma 3 4B outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while IBM Granite 4.2 30B is better at 3 benchmarks (Bird-SQL (dev), GPQA, MMLU-Pro).

IBM Granite 4.2 30B significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Mon Aug 31 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

26.0B diff

IBM Granite 4.2 30B has 26.0B more parameters than Gemma 3 4B, making it 650.0% larger.

Google
Gemma 3 4B
4.0Bparameters
IBM
IBM Granite 4.2 30B
30.0Bparameters
4.0B
Gemma 3 4B
30.0B
IBM Granite 4.2 30B

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Gemma 3 4B specifies input context (131,072 tokens). Only Gemma 3 4B specifies output context (131,072 tokens).

Google
Gemma 3 4B
Input131,072 tokens
Output131,072 tokens
IBM
IBM Granite 4.2 30B
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Mon Aug 31 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Gemma 3 4B supports multimodal inputs, whereas IBM Granite 4.2 30B does not.

Gemma 3 4B can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Gemma 3 4B

Text
Images
Audio
Video

IBM Granite 4.2 30B

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Gemma 3 4B is licensed under Gemma, while IBM Granite 4.2 30B uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Gemma 3 4B

Gemma

Open weights

IBM Granite 4.2 30B

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Gemma 3 4B was released on 2025-03-12, while IBM Granite 4.2 30B was released on 2026-08-25.

IBM Granite 4.2 30B is 18 months newer than Gemma 3 4B.

Gemma 3 4B

Mar 12, 2025

1.5 years ago

IBM Granite 4.2 30B

Aug 25, 2026

6 days ago

1.5yr newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Gemma 3 4B has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2024-08-01, while IBM Granite 4.2 30B's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Gemma 3 4B's training data extends to 2024-08-01, but cannot make a direct comparison without IBM Granite 4.2 30B's cutoff date.

Gemma 3 4B

Aug 2024

IBM Granite 4.2 30B

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Gemma 3 4B and IBM Granite 4.2 30B side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Gemma 3 4B
✓ Preferred
IBM Granite 4.2 30B
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Gemma 3 4B vs IBM Granite 4.2 30B.

Which is better, Gemma 3 4B or IBM Granite 4.2 30B?

IBM Granite 4.2 30B leads the LLM Stats Score 24.0 to -1.6. Gemma 3 4B is made by Google and IBM Granite 4.2 30B is made by IBM. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Gemma 3 4B compare to IBM Granite 4.2 30B in benchmarks?

Gemma 3 4B scores IFEval: 90.2%, GSM8k: 89.2%, DocVQA: 75.8%, MATH: 75.6%, AI2D: 74.8%. IBM Granite 4.2 30B scores RULER 64k: 90.0%, AIME 2025: 89.2%, HMMT25: 89.2%, RULER 128k: 81.4%, MMLU-Pro: 77.6%.

What are the context window sizes for Gemma 3 4B and IBM Granite 4.2 30B?

Gemma 3 4B supports 131K tokens and IBM Granite 4.2 30B supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Gemma 3 4B and IBM Granite 4.2 30B?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (-1.6 vs 24.0), multimodal support (yes vs no), licensing (Gemma vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Gemma 3 4B and IBM Granite 4.2 30B?

Gemma 3 4B is developed by Google and IBM Granite 4.2 30B is developed by IBM.