The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview) vs North Micro Vision Instruct

North Micro Vision Instruct leads the LLM Stats Score -4.9 to -9.4.

Google · Cohere · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

North Micro Vision Instruct leads the overall LLM Stats Score -4.9 to -9.4, ranking #342 overall.

In the 2 individual benchmarks reported for both models, Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview) wins 2; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview)

  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 2 of 2 exact shared results

Choose North Micro Vision Instruct

  • overall performance matters — it scores -4.9 and ranks #342 on LLM Stats
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Aug 2026

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview)
Google
North Micro Vision Instruct
Cohere
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
-9.4
#353
-4.9
#342
Reasoning
-9.7
#345
-7.3
#342
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
2 of 2
0 of 2
Input price
— / M
— / M
Output price
— / M
— / M
Context window
—
—

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

3 shared
Index
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview)
North Micro Vision Instruct
Math
-6.0#312
-12.3#317
Finance
-9.2#214
-12.0#216
Legal
-9.2#198
-12.0#200
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

28 reported for Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview) · 19 for North Micro Vision Instruct

2 shared

Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview) outperforms in 2 benchmarks (MMLU, MMLU-Pro), while North Micro Vision Instruct is better at 0 benchmarks.

Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview) significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Sat Sep 05 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

490.0M diff

North Micro Vision Instruct has 0.5B more parameters than Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview), making it 25.7% larger.

Google
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview)
1.9Bparameters
Cohere
North Micro Vision Instruct
2.4Bparameters
1.9B
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview)
2.4B
North Micro Vision Instruct

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Both Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview) and North Micro Vision Instruct support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview)

Text
Images
Audio
Video

North Micro Vision Instruct

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview) is licensed under Gemma, while North Micro Vision Instruct uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview)

Gemma

Open weights

North Micro Vision Instruct

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview) was released on 2025-05-20, while North Micro Vision Instruct was released on 2026-08-12.

North Micro Vision Instruct is 15 months newer than Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview).

Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview)

May 20, 2025

1.3 years ago

North Micro Vision Instruct

Aug 12, 2026

3 weeks ago

1.2yr newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview) has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2024-06-01, while North Micro Vision Instruct's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview)'s training data extends to 2024-06-01, but cannot make a direct comparison without North Micro Vision Instruct's cutoff date.

Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview)

Jun 2024

North Micro Vision Instruct

—

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview) and North Micro Vision Instruct side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview)
✓ Preferred
North Micro Vision Instruct
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview) vs North Micro Vision Instruct.

Which is better, Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview) or North Micro Vision Instruct?

North Micro Vision Instruct leads the LLM Stats Score -4.9 to -9.4. Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview) is made by Google and North Micro Vision Instruct is made by Cohere. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview) compare to North Micro Vision Instruct in benchmarks?

Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview) scores PIQA: 78.9%, BoolQ: 76.4%, ARC-E: 75.8%, HellaSwag: 72.2%, Winogrande: 66.8%. North Micro Vision Instruct scores DocVQA: 92.1%, ChartQA: 80.8%, OCRBench: 79.2%, AI2D: 77.5%, IFEval: 74.9%.

What are the main differences between Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview) and North Micro Vision Instruct?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (-9.4 vs -4.9), licensing (Gemma vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview) and North Micro Vision Instruct?

Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview) is developed by Google and North Micro Vision Instruct is developed by Cohere.

Related comparisons