The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

MiniMax M3.1 Flash vs North Micro Vision Instruct

MiniMax M3.1 Flash leads the LLM Stats Score 48.5 to -5.4.

MiniMax · Cohere · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

MiniMax M3.1 Flash leads the overall LLM Stats Score 48.5 to -5.4, ranking #29 overall.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose MiniMax M3.1 Flash

  • overall performance matters — it scores 48.5 and ranks #29 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning — it leads those capability indexes
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Oct 2026

Choose North Micro Vision Instruct

  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

MiniMax M3.1 Flash
MiniMax
North Micro Vision Instruct
Cohere
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
48.5
#29
-5.4
#379
Reasoning
45.8
#34
-8.0
#379
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
—
—
Input price
$0.15 / M
— / M
Output price
$0.60 / M
— / M
Context window
1,000,000
—

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

2 shared
Index
MiniMax M3.1 Flash
North Micro Vision Instruct
Vision
28.8#42
-5.0#220
Multimodal
30.2#38
-3.3#182
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

15 reported for MiniMax M3.1 Flash · 19 for North Micro Vision Instruct

No common benchmarks found

MiniMax M3.1 Flash and North Micro Vision Instructdon't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only MiniMax M3.1 Flash specifies input context (1,000,000 tokens). Only MiniMax M3.1 Flash specifies output context (524,288 tokens).

MiniMax
MiniMax M3.1 Flash
Input1,000,000 tokens
Output524,288 tokens
Cohere
North Micro Vision Instruct
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Tue Oct 20 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Both MiniMax M3.1 Flash and North Micro Vision Instruct support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

MiniMax M3.1 Flash

Text
Images
Audio
Video

North Micro Vision Instruct

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

MiniMax M3.1 Flash is licensed under a proprietary license, while North Micro Vision Instruct uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

MiniMax M3.1 Flash

Proprietary

Closed source

North Micro Vision Instruct

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

MiniMax M3.1 Flash was released on 2026-10-19, while North Micro Vision Instruct was released on 2026-08-12.

MiniMax M3.1 Flash is 2 months newer than North Micro Vision Instruct.

MiniMax M3.1 Flash

Oct 19, 2026

-2 days ago

2mo newer
North Micro Vision Instruct

Aug 12, 2026

2 months ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against MiniMax M3.1 Flash and North Micro Vision Instruct side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

MiniMax M3.1 Flash
✓ Preferred
North Micro Vision Instruct
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about MiniMax M3.1 Flash vs North Micro Vision Instruct.

Which is better, MiniMax M3.1 Flash or North Micro Vision Instruct?

MiniMax M3.1 Flash leads the LLM Stats Score 48.5 to -5.4. MiniMax M3.1 Flash is made by MiniMax and North Micro Vision Instruct is made by Cohere. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does MiniMax M3.1 Flash compare to North Micro Vision Instruct in benchmarks?

MiniMax M3.1 Flash scores BabyVision: 91.0%, CharXiv-R: 82.5%, CyberGym: 82.2%, BankerToolBench: 76.2%, DeepSWE 1.1: 73.7%. North Micro Vision Instruct scores DocVQA: 92.1%, ChartQA: 80.8%, OCRBench: 79.2%, AI2D: 77.5%, IFEval: 74.9%.

What are the context window sizes for MiniMax M3.1 Flash and North Micro Vision Instruct?

MiniMax M3.1 Flash supports 1.0M tokens and North Micro Vision Instruct supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between MiniMax M3.1 Flash and North Micro Vision Instruct?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (48.5 vs -5.4), licensing (Proprietary vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes MiniMax M3.1 Flash and North Micro Vision Instruct?

MiniMax M3.1 Flash is developed by MiniMax and North Micro Vision Instruct is developed by Cohere.

Related comparisons