The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview) vs o3

o3 leads the LLM Stats Score 31.1 to -9.4.

Google · OpenAI · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

o3 leads the overall LLM Stats Score 31.1 to -9.4, ranking #105 overall.

In the 2 individual benchmarks reported for both models, o3 wins 2; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview)

  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped May 2025
  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

Choose o3

  • overall performance matters — it scores 31.1 and ranks #105 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning and coding — it leads those capability indexes
  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 2 of 2 exact shared results

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview)
Google
o3
OpenAI
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
-9.4
#353
31.1
#105
Reasoning
-9.7
#345
30.8
#108
Coding
-4.3
#247
15.3
#122
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
0 of 2
2 of 2
Input price
— / M
$2.00 / M
Output price
— / M
$8.00 / M
Context window
—
200,000

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

1 shared
Index
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview)
o3
Math
-6.0#312
25.7#101
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

28 reported for Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview) · 22 for o3

2 shared

Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview) outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while o3 is better at 2 benchmarks (AIME 2025, GPQA).

o3 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Mon Sep 07 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only o3 specifies input context (200,000 tokens). Only o3 specifies output context (100,000 tokens).

Google
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview)
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
OpenAI
o3
Input200,000 tokens
Output100,000 tokens
Mon Sep 07 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Both Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview) and o3 support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview)

Text
Images
Audio
Video

o3

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview) is licensed under Gemma, while o3 uses a proprietary license.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview)

Gemma

Open weights

o3

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview) was released on 2025-05-20, while o3 was released on 2025-04-16.

Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview) is 1 month newer than o3.

Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview)

May 20, 2025

1.3 years ago

1mo newer
o3

Apr 16, 2025

1.4 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview) has a knowledge cutoff of 2024-06-01, while o3 has a cutoff of 2024-05-31.

Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview) has more recent training data (up to 2024-06-01), making it potentially better informed about events through that date compared to o3 (2024-05-31).

Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview)

Jun 2024

1 mo newer
o3

May 2024

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview) and o3 side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview)
✓ Preferred
o3
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview) vs o3.

Which is better, Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview) or o3?

o3 leads the LLM Stats Score 31.1 to -9.4. Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview) is made by Google and o3 is made by OpenAI. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview) compare to o3 in benchmarks?

Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview) scores PIQA: 78.9%, BoolQ: 76.4%, ARC-E: 75.8%, HellaSwag: 72.2%, Winogrande: 66.8%. o3 scores COLLIE: 98.4%, AIME 2024: 91.6%, ARC-AGI: 88.0%, MathVista: 86.8%, AIME 2025: 86.4%.

What are the context window sizes for Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview) and o3?

Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview) supports an unknown number of tokens and o3 supports 200K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview) and o3?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (-9.4 vs 31.1), licensing (Gemma vs Proprietary). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview) and o3?

Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview) is developed by Google and o3 is developed by OpenAI.

Related comparisons