The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

MiMo-V2.6-Pro vs o3

MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads the LLM Stats Score 40.6 to 31.1.

Xiaomi · OpenAI · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads the overall LLM Stats Score 40.6 to 31.1, ranking #57 overall.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose MiMo-V2.6-Pro

  • overall performance matters — it scores 40.6 and ranks #57 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes coding and agents — it leads those capability indexes
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Sep 2026
  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

Choose o3

  • you want predictable pricing at $2.00/M input and $8.00/M output

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Core performance indexes
40.6
#57
31.1
#116
34.1
#35
14.9
#133
29.9
#38
4.0
#162
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
Input price
— / M
$2.00 / M
Output price
— / M
$8.00 / M
Context window
200,000

Individual benchmarks

3 reported for MiMo-V2.6-Pro · 22 for o3

No common benchmarks found

MiMo-V2.6-Pro and o3don't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only o3 specifies input context (200,000 tokens). Only o3 specifies output context (100,000 tokens).

Xiaomi
MiMo-V2.6-Pro
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
OpenAI
o3
Input200,000 tokens
Output100,000 tokens
Mon Sep 21 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Both MiMo-V2.6-Pro and o3 support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

MiMo-V2.6-Pro

Text
Images
Audio
Video

o3

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

MiMo-V2.6-Pro is licensed under MIT, while o3 uses a proprietary license.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

MiMo-V2.6-Pro

MIT

Open weights

o3

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

MiMo-V2.6-Pro was released on 2026-09-22, while o3 was released on 2025-04-16.

MiMo-V2.6-Pro is 17 months newer than o3.

MiMo-V2.6-Pro

Sep 22, 2026

-1 days ago

1.4yr newer
o3

Apr 16, 2025

1.4 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

o3 has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2024-05-31, while MiMo-V2.6-Pro's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm o3's training data extends to 2024-05-31, but cannot make a direct comparison without MiMo-V2.6-Pro's cutoff date.

MiMo-V2.6-Pro

o3

May 2024

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against MiMo-V2.6-Pro and o3 side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

MiMo-V2.6-Pro
✓ Preferred
o3
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about MiMo-V2.6-Pro vs o3.

Which is better, MiMo-V2.6-Pro or o3?

MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads the LLM Stats Score 40.6 to 31.1. MiMo-V2.6-Pro is made by Xiaomi and o3 is made by OpenAI. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does MiMo-V2.6-Pro compare to o3 in benchmarks?

MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores DeepSWE 1.1: 71.9%, MiMo Coding Bench: 63.2%, Program Bench: 26.5%. o3 scores COLLIE: 98.4%, AIME 2024: 91.6%, ARC-AGI: 88.0%, MathVista: 86.8%, AIME 2025: 86.4%.

What are the context window sizes for MiMo-V2.6-Pro and o3?

MiMo-V2.6-Pro supports an unknown number of tokens and o3 supports 200K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between MiMo-V2.6-Pro and o3?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (40.6 vs 31.1), licensing (MIT vs Proprietary). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes MiMo-V2.6-Pro and o3?

MiMo-V2.6-Pro is developed by Xiaomi and o3 is developed by OpenAI.