The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Gemma 3n E2B Instructed vs IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview

IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview leads the LLM Stats Score -5.8 to -10.9.

Google · IBM · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview leads the overall LLM Stats Score -5.8 to -10.9, ranking #382 overall.

In the 2 individual benchmarks reported for both models, IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview wins 2; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Gemma 3n E2B Instructed

  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Jun 2025

Choose IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview

  • overall performance matters — it scores -5.8 and ranks #382 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning — it leads those capability indexes
  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 2 of 2 exact shared results
  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Gemma 3n E2B Instructed
Google
IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview
IBM
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
-10.9
#392
-5.8
#382
Reasoning
-11.3
#384
-5.8
#372
Coding
-4.5
#280
2.9
#243
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
0 of 2
2 of 2
Input price
— / M
— / M
Output price
— / M
— / M
Context window
—
—

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

3 shared
Index
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed
IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview
Math
-8.0#336
-5.8#330
Finance
-9.7#234
-3.7#217
Legal
-9.7#215
-3.7#200
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

18 reported for Gemma 3n E2B Instructed · 12 for IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview

2 shared

Gemma 3n E2B Instructed outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview is better at 2 benchmarks (HumanEval, MMLU).

IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Wed Oct 21 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

1.0B diff

Gemma 3n E2B Instructed has 1.0B more parameters than IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview, making it 14.3% larger.

Google
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed
8.0Bparameters
IBM
IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview
7.0Bparameters
8.0B
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed
7.0B
IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Gemma 3n E2B Instructed supports multimodal inputs, whereas IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview does not.

Gemma 3n E2B Instructed can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Gemma 3n E2B Instructed

Text
Images
Audio
Video

IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Gemma 3n E2B Instructed is licensed under a proprietary license, while IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Gemma 3n E2B Instructed

Proprietary

Closed source

IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Gemma 3n E2B Instructed was released on 2025-06-26, while IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview was released on 2025-05-02.

Gemma 3n E2B Instructed is 2 months newer than IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview.

Gemma 3n E2B Instructed

Jun 26, 2025

1.3 years ago

1mo newer
IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview

May 2, 2025

1.5 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Gemma 3n E2B Instructed has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2024-06-01, while IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Gemma 3n E2B Instructed's training data extends to 2024-06-01, but cannot make a direct comparison without IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview's cutoff date.

Gemma 3n E2B Instructed

Jun 2024

IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview

—

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Gemma 3n E2B Instructed and IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Gemma 3n E2B Instructed
✓ Preferred
IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Gemma 3n E2B Instructed vs IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview.

Which is better, Gemma 3n E2B Instructed or IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview?

IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview leads the LLM Stats Score -5.8 to -10.9. Gemma 3n E2B Instructed is made by Google and IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview is made by IBM. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Gemma 3n E2B Instructed compare to IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview in benchmarks?

Gemma 3n E2B Instructed scores HumanEval: 66.5%, MMLU: 60.1%, Global-MMLU-Lite: 59.0%, MBPP: 56.6%, Global-MMLU: 55.1%. IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview scores AttaQ: 86.1%, HumanEval: 82.4%, HumanEval+: 78.3%, GSM8k: 70.1%, IFEval: 63.0%.

What are the main differences between Gemma 3n E2B Instructed and IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (-10.9 vs -5.8), multimodal support (yes vs no), licensing (Proprietary vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Gemma 3n E2B Instructed and IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview?

Gemma 3n E2B Instructed is developed by Google and IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview is developed by IBM.

Related comparisons