The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Gemma 3n E2B Instructed vs IBM Granite 4.2 3B

IBM Granite 4.2 3B leads the LLM Stats Score 15.6 to -10.3.

Google · IBM · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

IBM Granite 4.2 3B leads the overall LLM Stats Score 15.6 to -10.3, ranking #213 overall.

In the 3 individual benchmarks reported for both models, IBM Granite 4.2 3B wins 3; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Gemma 3n E2B Instructed

  • you are already invested in the Google ecosystem

Choose IBM Granite 4.2 3B

  • overall performance matters — it scores 15.6 and ranks #213 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning — it leads those capability indexes
  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 3 of 3 exact shared results
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Aug 2026
  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Core performance indexes
-10.3
#351
15.6
#213
-10.8
#343
12.0
#234
-4.3
#243
-6.7
#247
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
0 of 3
3 of 3
Input price
— / M
— / M
Output price
— / M
— / M
Context window

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

1 shared
Index
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed
IBM Granite 4.2 3B
-7.6#313
13.7#216
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

18 reported for Gemma 3n E2B Instructed · 13 for IBM Granite 4.2 3B

3 shared

Gemma 3n E2B Instructed outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while IBM Granite 4.2 3B is better at 3 benchmarks (AIME 2025, GPQA, MMLU-Pro).

IBM Granite 4.2 3B significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Tue Sep 01 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

5.0B diff

Gemma 3n E2B Instructed has 5.0B more parameters than IBM Granite 4.2 3B, making it 166.7% larger.

Google
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed
8.0Bparameters
IBM
IBM Granite 4.2 3B
3.0Bparameters
8.0B
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed
3.0B
IBM Granite 4.2 3B

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Gemma 3n E2B Instructed supports multimodal inputs, whereas IBM Granite 4.2 3B does not.

Gemma 3n E2B Instructed can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Gemma 3n E2B Instructed

Text
Images
Audio
Video

IBM Granite 4.2 3B

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Gemma 3n E2B Instructed is licensed under a proprietary license, while IBM Granite 4.2 3B uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Gemma 3n E2B Instructed

Proprietary

Closed source

IBM Granite 4.2 3B

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Gemma 3n E2B Instructed was released on 2025-06-26, while IBM Granite 4.2 3B was released on 2026-08-25.

IBM Granite 4.2 3B is 14 months newer than Gemma 3n E2B Instructed.

Gemma 3n E2B Instructed

Jun 26, 2025

1.2 years ago

IBM Granite 4.2 3B

Aug 25, 2026

6 days ago

1.2yr newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Gemma 3n E2B Instructed has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2024-06-01, while IBM Granite 4.2 3B's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Gemma 3n E2B Instructed's training data extends to 2024-06-01, but cannot make a direct comparison without IBM Granite 4.2 3B's cutoff date.

Gemma 3n E2B Instructed

Jun 2024

IBM Granite 4.2 3B

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Gemma 3n E2B Instructed and IBM Granite 4.2 3B side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Gemma 3n E2B Instructed
✓ Preferred
IBM Granite 4.2 3B
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Gemma 3n E2B Instructed vs IBM Granite 4.2 3B.

Which is better, Gemma 3n E2B Instructed or IBM Granite 4.2 3B?

IBM Granite 4.2 3B leads the LLM Stats Score 15.6 to -10.3. Gemma 3n E2B Instructed is made by Google and IBM Granite 4.2 3B is made by IBM. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Gemma 3n E2B Instructed compare to IBM Granite 4.2 3B in benchmarks?

Gemma 3n E2B Instructed scores HumanEval: 66.5%, MMLU: 60.1%, Global-MMLU-Lite: 59.0%, MBPP: 56.6%, Global-MMLU: 55.1%. IBM Granite 4.2 3B scores AIME 2025: 78.3%, IFBench: 74.3%, LiveCodeBench v6: 69.7%, MMLU-Pro: 67.8%, RULER 64k: 67.5%.

What are the main differences between Gemma 3n E2B Instructed and IBM Granite 4.2 3B?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (-10.3 vs 15.6), multimodal support (yes vs no), licensing (Proprietary vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Gemma 3n E2B Instructed and IBM Granite 4.2 3B?

Gemma 3n E2B Instructed is developed by Google and IBM Granite 4.2 3B is developed by IBM.