The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Gemma 3n E2B vs Gemma 3n E4B

Gemma 3n E2B and Gemma 3n E4B are closely matched at -10.7 and -6.6 on the LLM Stats Score.

Google · Google · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Gemma 3n E2B and Gemma 3n E4B are closely matched on the overall LLM Stats Score at -10.7 and -6.6.

In the 11 individual benchmarks reported for both models, Gemma 3n E4B wins 11; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Gemma 3n E2B

  • you are already invested in the Google ecosystem

Choose Gemma 3n E4B

  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 11 of 11 exact shared results

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Core performance indexes
-10.7
#392
-6.6
#387
-10.9
#385
-6.9
#379
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
0 of 11
11 of 11
Input price
— / M
— / M
Output price
— / M
— / M
Context window
—
—

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

1 shared
Index
Gemma 3n E2B
Gemma 3n E4B
-6.3#333
-2.8#325
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

11 reported for Gemma 3n E2B · 11 for Gemma 3n E4B

11 shared

Gemma 3n E2B outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while Gemma 3n E4B is better at 11 benchmarks (ARC-C, ARC-E, BIG-Bench Hard, BoolQ, DROP, HellaSwag, Natural Questions, PIQA, Social IQa, TriviaQA, Winogrande).

Gemma 3n E4B significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Sat Oct 24 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

0.0M diff

Gemma 3n E4B has 0.0B more parameters than Gemma 3n E2B, making it 0.0% larger.

Google
Gemma 3n E2B
8.0Bparameters
Google
Gemma 3n E4B
8.0Bparameters
8.0B
Gemma 3n E2B
8.0B
Gemma 3n E4B

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Both Gemma 3n E2B and Gemma 3n E4B support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

Gemma 3n E2B

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Gemma 3n E4B

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under proprietary licenses.

Both models have usage restrictions defined by their respective organizations.

Gemma 3n E2B

Proprietary

Closed source

Gemma 3n E4B

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Both models were released on 2025-06-26.

They likely represent similar generations of model development.

Gemma 3n E2B

Jun 26, 2025

1.3 years ago

Gemma 3n E4B

Jun 26, 2025

1.3 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Both models have the same knowledge cutoff date of 2024-06-01.

They should have similar awareness of historical events and information up to this date.

Gemma 3n E2B

Jun 2024

Gemma 3n E4B

Jun 2024

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Gemma 3n E2B and Gemma 3n E4B side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Gemma 3n E2B
✓ Preferred
Gemma 3n E4B
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Gemma 3n E2B vs Gemma 3n E4B.

Which is better, Gemma 3n E2B or Gemma 3n E4B?

Gemma 3n E2B and Gemma 3n E4B are closely matched on the LLM Stats Score at -10.7 and -6.6. Gemma 3n E2B is made by Google and Gemma 3n E4B is made by Google. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Gemma 3n E2B compare to Gemma 3n E4B in benchmarks?

Gemma 3n E2B scores PIQA: 78.9%, BoolQ: 76.4%, ARC-E: 75.8%, HellaSwag: 72.2%, Winogrande: 66.8%. Gemma 3n E4B scores ARC-E: 81.6%, BoolQ: 81.6%, PIQA: 81.0%, HellaSwag: 78.6%, Winogrande: 71.7%.

What are the main differences between Gemma 3n E2B and Gemma 3n E4B?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (-10.7 vs -6.6). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.