Model Comparison

Gemma 3n E2B vs Gemma 3n E4BWhich is better in 2026?

Gemma 3n E4B significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Verdict: Gemma 3n E2B vs Gemma 3n E4B — which is better?

Gemma 3n E2B (by Google) and Gemma 3n E4B (by Google) are two of the AI models people compare most. Here is how they stack up on benchmarks, price and capabilities, and which one to pick in 2026.

Gemma 3n E2B outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while Gemma 3n E4B is better at 11 benchmarks (ARC-C, ARC-E, BIG-Bench Hard, BoolQ, DROP, HellaSwag, Natural Questions, PIQA, Social IQa, TriviaQA, Winogrande). Gemma 3n E4B significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Choose Gemma 3n E2B if…

  • you are already invested in the Google ecosystem

Choose Gemma 3n E4B if…

  • you want the strongest raw capability — it leads on 11 of 11 shared benchmarks
Want to compare interactively?Try the playground

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

11 benchmarks

Gemma 3n E2B outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while Gemma 3n E4B is better at 11 benchmarks (ARC-C, ARC-E, BIG-Bench Hard, BoolQ, DROP, HellaSwag, Natural Questions, PIQA, Social IQa, TriviaQA, Winogrande).

Gemma 3n E4B significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Tue Jun 09 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

0.0M diff

Gemma 3n E4B has 0.0B more parameters than Gemma 3n E2B, making it 0.0% larger.

Google
Gemma 3n E2B
8.0Bparameters
Google
Gemma 3n E4B
8.0Bparameters
8.0B
Gemma 3n E2B
8.0B
Gemma 3n E4B

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Both Gemma 3n E2B and Gemma 3n E4B support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

Gemma 3n E2B

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Gemma 3n E4B

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under proprietary licenses.

Both models have usage restrictions defined by their respective organizations.

Gemma 3n E2B

Proprietary

Closed source

Gemma 3n E4B

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Both models were released on 2025-06-26.

They likely represent similar generations of model development.

Gemma 3n E2B

Jun 26, 2025

11 months ago

Gemma 3n E4B

Jun 26, 2025

11 months ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Both models have the same knowledge cutoff date of 2024-06-01.

They should have similar awareness of historical events and information up to this date.

Gemma 3n E2B

Jun 2024

Gemma 3n E4B

Jun 2024

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Key Takeaways

Google

No standout differentiators in the data we have for this pair.

Google
Higher ARC-C score (61.6% vs 51.7%)
Higher ARC-E score (81.6% vs 75.8%)
Higher BIG-Bench Hard score (52.9% vs 44.3%)
Higher BoolQ score (81.6% vs 76.4%)
Higher DROP score (60.8% vs 53.9%)
Higher HellaSwag score (78.6% vs 72.2%)
Higher Natural Questions score (20.9% vs 15.5%)
Higher PIQA score (81.0% vs 78.9%)
Higher Social IQa score (50.0% vs 48.8%)
Higher TriviaQA score (70.2% vs 60.8%)
Higher Winogrande score (71.7% vs 66.8%)

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
Google
Gemma 3n E2B
Google
Gemma 3n E4B

FAQ

Common questions about Gemma 3n E2B vs Gemma 3n E4B.

Which is better, Gemma 3n E2B or Gemma 3n E4B?

Gemma 3n E4B significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Gemma 3n E2B is made by Google and Gemma 3n E4B is made by Google. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.

How does Gemma 3n E2B compare to Gemma 3n E4B in benchmarks?

Gemma 3n E2B scores PIQA: 78.9%, BoolQ: 76.4%, ARC-E: 75.8%, HellaSwag: 72.2%, Winogrande: 66.8%. Gemma 3n E4B scores ARC-E: 81.6%, BoolQ: 81.6%, PIQA: 81.0%, HellaSwag: 78.6%, Winogrande: 71.7%.

Related comparisons