Model Comparison

Gemma 3n E2B vs Gemma 3n E4B

Gemma 3n E4B significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Want to compare interactively?Try the playground

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

11 benchmarks

Gemma 3n E2B outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while Gemma 3n E4B is better at 11 benchmarks (ARC-C, ARC-E, BIG-Bench Hard, BoolQ, DROP, HellaSwag, Natural Questions, PIQA, Social IQa, TriviaQA, Winogrande).

Gemma 3n E4B significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Tue Apr 07 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Cost data unavailable.

Lowest available price from all providers
Tue Apr 07 2026 • llm-stats.com
Google
Gemma 3n E2B
Input tokens$0.00
Output tokens$0.00
Best providerUnknown Organization
Google
Gemma 3n E4B
Input tokens$0.00
Output tokens$0.00
Best providerUnknown Organization
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue→

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

0.0M diff

Gemma 3n E4B has 0.0B more parameters than Gemma 3n E2B, making it 0.0% larger.

Google
Gemma 3n E2B
8.0Bparameters
Google
Gemma 3n E4B
8.0Bparameters
8.0B
Gemma 3n E2B
8.0B
Gemma 3n E4B

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Both Gemma 3n E2B and Gemma 3n E4B support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

Gemma 3n E2B

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Gemma 3n E4B

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under proprietary licenses.

Both models have usage restrictions defined by their respective organizations.

Gemma 3n E2B

Proprietary

Closed source

Gemma 3n E4B

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Both models were released on 2025-06-26.

They likely represent similar generations of model development.

Gemma 3n E2B

Jun 26, 2025

9 months ago

Gemma 3n E4B

Jun 26, 2025

9 months ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Both models have the same knowledge cutoff date of 2024-06-01.

They should have similar awareness of historical events and information up to this date.

Gemma 3n E2B

Jun 2024

Gemma 3n E4B

Jun 2024

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Key Takeaways

Google
Google
Higher ARC-C score (61.6% vs 51.7%)
Higher ARC-E score (81.6% vs 75.8%)
Higher BIG-Bench Hard score (52.9% vs 44.3%)
Higher BoolQ score (81.6% vs 76.4%)
Higher DROP score (60.8% vs 53.9%)
Higher HellaSwag score (78.6% vs 72.2%)
Higher Natural Questions score (20.9% vs 15.5%)
Higher PIQA score (81.0% vs 78.9%)
Higher Social IQa score (50.0% vs 48.8%)
Higher TriviaQA score (70.2% vs 60.8%)
Higher Winogrande score (71.7% vs 66.8%)

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
Google
Gemma 3n E2B
Google
Gemma 3n E4B

FAQ

Common questions about Gemma 3n E2B vs Gemma 3n E4B

Gemma 3n E4B significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Gemma 3n E2B is made by Google and Gemma 3n E4B is made by Google. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.
Gemma 3n E2B scores PIQA: 78.9%, BoolQ: 76.4%, ARC-E: 75.8%, HellaSwag: 72.2%, Winogrande: 66.8%. Gemma 3n E4B scores ARC-E: 81.6%, BoolQ: 81.6%, PIQA: 81.0%, HellaSwag: 78.6%, Winogrande: 71.7%.