The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview vs MiniMax M3.1 Flash

MiniMax M3.1 Flash leads the LLM Stats Score 48.7 to -5.6.

Google · MiniMax · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

MiniMax M3.1 Flash leads the overall LLM Stats Score 48.7 to -5.6, ranking #29 overall.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview

  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

Choose MiniMax M3.1 Flash

  • overall performance matters — it scores 48.7 and ranks #29 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning and coding — it leads those capability indexes
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Oct 2026

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview
Google
MiniMax M3.1 Flash
MiniMax
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
-5.6
#382
48.7
#29
Reasoning
-6.4
#377
45.9
#32
Coding
-0.2
#265
37.9
#23
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
—
—
Input price
— / M
$0.15 / M
Output price
— / M
$0.60 / M
Context window
—
1,000,000

Individual benchmarks

28 reported for Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview · 15 for MiniMax M3.1 Flash

No common benchmarks found

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview and MiniMax M3.1 Flashdon't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only MiniMax M3.1 Flash specifies input context (1,000,000 tokens). Only MiniMax M3.1 Flash specifies output context (524,288 tokens).

Google
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
MiniMax
MiniMax M3.1 Flash
Input1,000,000 tokens
Output524,288 tokens
Wed Oct 28 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Both Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview and MiniMax M3.1 Flash support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview

Text
Images
Audio
Video

MiniMax M3.1 Flash

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview is licensed under Gemma, while MiniMax M3.1 Flash uses a proprietary license.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview

Gemma

Open weights

MiniMax M3.1 Flash

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview was released on 2025-05-20, while MiniMax M3.1 Flash was released on 2026-10-19.

MiniMax M3.1 Flash is 17 months newer than Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview.

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview

May 20, 2025

1.4 years ago

MiniMax M3.1 Flash

Oct 19, 2026

1 weeks ago

1.4yr newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2024-06-01, while MiniMax M3.1 Flash's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview's training data extends to 2024-06-01, but cannot make a direct comparison without MiniMax M3.1 Flash's cutoff date.

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview

Jun 2024

MiniMax M3.1 Flash

—

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview and MiniMax M3.1 Flash side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview
✓ Preferred
MiniMax M3.1 Flash
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview vs MiniMax M3.1 Flash.

Which is better, Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview or MiniMax M3.1 Flash?

MiniMax M3.1 Flash leads the LLM Stats Score 48.7 to -5.6. Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview is made by Google and MiniMax M3.1 Flash is made by MiniMax. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview compare to MiniMax M3.1 Flash in benchmarks?

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview scores ARC-E: 81.6%, BoolQ: 81.6%, PIQA: 81.0%, HellaSwag: 78.6%, HumanEval: 75.0%. MiniMax M3.1 Flash scores BabyVision: 91.0%, CharXiv-R: 82.5%, CyberGym: 82.2%, BankerToolBench: 76.2%, DeepSWE 1.1: 73.7%.

What are the context window sizes for Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview and MiniMax M3.1 Flash?

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview supports an unknown number of tokens and MiniMax M3.1 Flash supports 1.0M tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview and MiniMax M3.1 Flash?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (-5.6 vs 48.7), licensing (Gemma vs Proprietary). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview and MiniMax M3.1 Flash?

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview is developed by Google and MiniMax M3.1 Flash is developed by MiniMax.

Related comparisons