Model Comparison

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview vs Mistral Small 3.1 24B InstructWhich is better in 2026?

Mistral Small 3.1 24B Instruct significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Verdict: Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview vs Mistral Small 3.1 24B Instruct — which is better?

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview (by Google) and Mistral Small 3.1 24B Instruct (by Mistral AI) are two of the AI models people compare most. Here is how they stack up on benchmarks, price and capabilities, and which one to pick in 2026.

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while Mistral Small 3.1 24B Instruct is better at 6 benchmarks (GPQA, HumanEval, MBPP, MMLU, MMLU-Pro, TriviaQA). Mistral Small 3.1 24B Instruct significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Choose Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview if…

  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped May 2025

Choose Mistral Small 3.1 24B Instruct if…

  • you want the strongest raw capability — it leads on 6 of 6 shared benchmarks
Want to compare interactively?Try the playground

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

6 benchmarks

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while Mistral Small 3.1 24B Instruct is better at 6 benchmarks (GPQA, HumanEval, MBPP, MMLU, MMLU-Pro, TriviaQA).

Mistral Small 3.1 24B Instruct significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Wed Jun 24 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

22.1B diff

Mistral Small 3.1 24B Instruct has 22.1B more parameters than Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview, making it 1156.5% larger.

Google
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview
1.9Bparameters
Mistral AI
Mistral Small 3.1 24B Instruct
24.0Bparameters
1.9B
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview
24.0B
Mistral Small 3.1 24B Instruct

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Both Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview and Mistral Small 3.1 24B Instruct support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Mistral Small 3.1 24B Instruct

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview is licensed under Gemma, while Mistral Small 3.1 24B Instruct uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview

Gemma

Open weights

Mistral Small 3.1 24B Instruct

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview was released on 2025-05-20, while Mistral Small 3.1 24B Instruct was released on 2025-03-17.

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview is 2 months newer than Mistral Small 3.1 24B Instruct.

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview

May 20, 2025

1.1 years ago

2mo newer
Mistral Small 3.1 24B Instruct

Mar 17, 2025

1.3 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2024-06-01, while Mistral Small 3.1 24B Instruct's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview's training data extends to 2024-06-01, but cannot make a direct comparison without Mistral Small 3.1 24B Instruct's cutoff date.

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview

Jun 2024

Mistral Small 3.1 24B Instruct

—

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Key Takeaways

Google

No standout differentiators in the data we have for this pair.

Mistral AI
Higher GPQA score (46.0% vs 23.7%)
Higher HumanEval score (88.4% vs 75.0%)
Higher MBPP score (74.7% vs 63.6%)
Higher MMLU score (80.6% vs 64.9%)
Higher MMLU-Pro score (66.8% vs 50.6%)
Higher TriviaQA score (80.5% vs 70.2%)

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
Google
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview
Mistral AI
Mistral Small 3.1 24B Instruct

FAQ

Common questions about Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview vs Mistral Small 3.1 24B Instruct.

Which is better, Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview or Mistral Small 3.1 24B Instruct?

Mistral Small 3.1 24B Instruct significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview is made by Google and Mistral Small 3.1 24B Instruct is made by Mistral AI. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.

How does Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview compare to Mistral Small 3.1 24B Instruct in benchmarks?

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview scores ARC-E: 81.6%, BoolQ: 81.6%, PIQA: 81.0%, HellaSwag: 78.6%, HumanEval: 75.0%. Mistral Small 3.1 24B Instruct scores HumanEval: 88.4%, MMLU: 80.6%, TriviaQA: 80.5%, MBPP: 74.7%, MATH: 69.3%.

What are the main differences between Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview and Mistral Small 3.1 24B Instruct?

Key differences include licensing (Gemma vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview and Mistral Small 3.1 24B Instruct?

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview is developed by Google and Mistral Small 3.1 24B Instruct is developed by Mistral AI.

Related comparisons