The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview vs Muse Wonder

Muse Wonder leads the LLM Stats Score 47.9 to -5.2.

Google · Meta · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Muse Wonder leads the overall LLM Stats Score 47.9 to -5.2, ranking #29 overall.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview

  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

Choose Muse Wonder

  • overall performance matters — it scores 47.9 and ranks #29 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning and coding — it leads those capability indexes
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Oct 2026

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview
Google
Muse Wonder
Meta
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
-5.2
#372
47.9
#29
Reasoning
-5.9
#367
33.1
#108
Coding
-0.1
#256
38.9
#18
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
—
—
Input price
— / M
$4.00 / M
Output price
— / M
$20.00 / M
Context window
—
1,048,576

Individual benchmarks

28 reported for Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview · 16 for Muse Wonder

No common benchmarks found

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview and Muse Wonderdon't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Muse Wonder specifies input context (1,048,576 tokens).

Google
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Meta
Muse Wonder
Input1,048,576 tokens
Output- tokens
Sat Oct 17 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Both Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview and Muse Wonder support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Muse Wonder

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview is licensed under Gemma, while Muse Wonder uses a proprietary license.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview

Gemma

Open weights

Muse Wonder

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview was released on 2025-05-20, while Muse Wonder was released on 2026-10-12.

Muse Wonder is 17 months newer than Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview.

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview

May 20, 2025

1.4 years ago

Muse Wonder

Oct 12, 2026

4 days ago

1.4yr newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2024-06-01, while Muse Wonder's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview's training data extends to 2024-06-01, but cannot make a direct comparison without Muse Wonder's cutoff date.

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview

Jun 2024

Muse Wonder

—

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview and Muse Wonder side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview
✓ Preferred
Muse Wonder
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview vs Muse Wonder.

Which is better, Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview or Muse Wonder?

Muse Wonder leads the LLM Stats Score 47.9 to -5.2. Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview is made by Google and Muse Wonder is made by Meta. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview compare to Muse Wonder in benchmarks?

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview scores ARC-E: 81.6%, BoolQ: 81.6%, PIQA: 81.0%, HellaSwag: 78.6%, HumanEval: 75.0%. Muse Wonder scores MemoryBench: 85.6%, DeepSWE 1.1: 78.8%, OSWorld 2.1 (partial): 72.6%, JobBench: 70.5%, HealthBench Professional: 60.5%.

What are the context window sizes for Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview and Muse Wonder?

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview supports an unknown number of tokens and Muse Wonder supports 1.0M tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview and Muse Wonder?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (-5.2 vs 47.9), licensing (Gemma vs Proprietary). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview and Muse Wonder?

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview is developed by Google and Muse Wonder is developed by Meta.

Related comparisons