Model Comparison

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview vs Nova LiteWhich is better in 2026?

Nova Lite significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Verdict: Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview vs Nova Lite — which is better?

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview (by Google) and Nova Lite (by Amazon) are two of the AI models people compare most. Here is how they stack up on benchmarks, price and capabilities, and which one to pick in 2026.

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while Nova Lite is better at 5 benchmarks (ARC-C, DROP, GPQA, HumanEval, MMLU). Nova Lite significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Choose Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview if…

  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped May 2025
  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

Choose Nova Lite if…

  • you want the strongest raw capability — it leads on 5 of 5 shared benchmarks
Want to compare interactively?Try the playground

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

5 benchmarks

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while Nova Lite is better at 5 benchmarks (ARC-C, DROP, GPQA, HumanEval, MMLU).

Nova Lite significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Sun Jun 07 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Nova Lite specifies input context (300,000 tokens). Only Nova Lite specifies output context (2,048 tokens).

Google
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Amazon
Nova Lite
Input300,000 tokens
Output2,048 tokens
Sun Jun 07 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Both Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview and Nova Lite support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Nova Lite

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview is licensed under Gemma, while Nova Lite uses a proprietary license.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview

Gemma

Open weights

Nova Lite

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview was released on 2025-05-20, while Nova Lite was released on 2024-11-20.

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview is 6 months newer than Nova Lite.

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview

May 20, 2025

1.0 years ago

6mo newer
Nova Lite

Nov 20, 2024

1.5 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2024-06-01, while Nova Lite's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview's training data extends to 2024-06-01, but cannot make a direct comparison without Nova Lite's cutoff date.

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview

Jun 2024

Nova Lite

—

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Key Takeaways

Google
Has open weights
Amazon
Larger context window (300,000 tokens)
Higher ARC-C score (92.4% vs 61.6%)
Higher DROP score (80.2% vs 60.8%)
Higher GPQA score (42.0% vs 23.7%)
Higher HumanEval score (85.4% vs 75.0%)
Higher MMLU score (80.5% vs 64.9%)

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
Google
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview
Amazon
Nova Lite

FAQ

Common questions about Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview vs Nova Lite.

Which is better, Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview or Nova Lite?

Nova Lite significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview is made by Google and Nova Lite is made by Amazon. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.

How does Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview compare to Nova Lite in benchmarks?

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview scores ARC-E: 81.6%, BoolQ: 81.6%, PIQA: 81.0%, HellaSwag: 78.6%, HumanEval: 75.0%. Nova Lite scores GSM8k: 94.5%, ARC-C: 92.4%, DocVQA: 92.4%, IFEval: 89.7%, Translation en→Set1 COMET22: 88.8%.

What are the context window sizes for Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview and Nova Lite?

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview supports an unknown number of tokens and Nova Lite supports 300K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview and Nova Lite?

Key differences include licensing (Gemma vs Proprietary). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview and Nova Lite?

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview is developed by Google and Nova Lite is developed by Amazon.

Related comparisons