Model Comparison

Gemma 3n E4B vs Mistral NeMo Instruct

Mistral NeMo Instruct significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Want to compare interactively?Try the playground

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

4 benchmarks

Gemma 3n E4B outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while Mistral NeMo Instruct is better at 4 benchmarks (HellaSwag, Natural Questions, TriviaQA, Winogrande).

Mistral NeMo Instruct significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Wed Apr 15 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Cost data unavailable.

Lowest available price from all providers
Wed Apr 15 2026 • llm-stats.com
Google
Gemma 3n E4B
Input tokens$0.00
Output tokens$0.00
Best providerUnknown Organization
Mistral AI
Mistral NeMo Instruct
Input tokens$0.15
Output tokens$0.15
Best providerGoogle
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue→

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

4.0B diff

Mistral NeMo Instruct has 4.0B more parameters than Gemma 3n E4B, making it 50.0% larger.

Google
Gemma 3n E4B
8.0Bparameters
Mistral AI
Mistral NeMo Instruct
12.0Bparameters
8.0B
Gemma 3n E4B
12.0B
Mistral NeMo Instruct

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Mistral NeMo Instruct specifies input context (128,000 tokens). Only Mistral NeMo Instruct specifies output context (128,000 tokens).

Google
Gemma 3n E4B
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Mistral AI
Mistral NeMo Instruct
Input128,000 tokens
Output128,000 tokens
Wed Apr 15 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Gemma 3n E4B supports multimodal inputs, whereas Mistral NeMo Instruct does not.

Gemma 3n E4B can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Gemma 3n E4B

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Mistral NeMo Instruct

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Gemma 3n E4B is licensed under a proprietary license, while Mistral NeMo Instruct uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Gemma 3n E4B

Proprietary

Closed source

Mistral NeMo Instruct

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Gemma 3n E4B was released on 2025-06-26, while Mistral NeMo Instruct was released on 2024-07-18.

Gemma 3n E4B is 11 months newer than Mistral NeMo Instruct.

Gemma 3n E4B

Jun 26, 2025

9 months ago

11mo newer
Mistral NeMo Instruct

Jul 18, 2024

1.7 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Gemma 3n E4B has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2024-06-01, while Mistral NeMo Instruct's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Gemma 3n E4B's training data extends to 2024-06-01, but cannot make a direct comparison without Mistral NeMo Instruct's cutoff date.

Gemma 3n E4B

Jun 2024

Mistral NeMo Instruct

—

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Key Takeaways

Google
Supports multimodal inputs
Mistral AI
Larger context window (128,000 tokens)
Has open weights
Higher HellaSwag score (83.5% vs 78.6%)
Higher Natural Questions score (31.2% vs 20.9%)
Higher TriviaQA score (73.8% vs 70.2%)
Higher Winogrande score (76.8% vs 71.7%)

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
Google
Gemma 3n E4B
Mistral AI
Mistral NeMo Instruct

FAQ

Common questions about Gemma 3n E4B vs Mistral NeMo Instruct

Mistral NeMo Instruct significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Gemma 3n E4B is made by Google and Mistral NeMo Instruct is made by Mistral AI. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.
Gemma 3n E4B scores ARC-E: 81.6%, BoolQ: 81.6%, PIQA: 81.0%, HellaSwag: 78.6%, Winogrande: 71.7%. Mistral NeMo Instruct scores HellaSwag: 83.5%, Winogrande: 76.8%, TriviaQA: 73.8%, CommonSenseQA: 70.4%, MMLU: 68.0%.
Gemma 3n E4B supports an unknown number of tokens and Mistral NeMo Instruct supports 128K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.
Key differences include multimodal support (yes vs no), licensing (Proprietary vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.
Gemma 3n E4B is developed by Google and Mistral NeMo Instruct is developed by Mistral AI.