The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Gemma 3n E4B vs Phi 4 Reasoning Plus

Phi 4 Reasoning Plus leads the LLM Stats Score 15.2 to -6.0.

Google · Microsoft · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Phi 4 Reasoning Plus leads the overall LLM Stats Score 15.2 to -6.0, ranking #219 overall.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Gemma 3n E4B

  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Jun 2025

Choose Phi 4 Reasoning Plus

  • overall performance matters — it scores 15.2 and ranks #219 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning — it leads those capability indexes
  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Core performance indexes
-6.0
#350
15.2
#219
-6.3
#340
15.5
#213
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
Input price
— / M
— / M
Output price
— / M
— / M
Context window

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

1 shared
Index
Gemma 3n E4B
Phi 4 Reasoning Plus
-2.5#303
18.3#174
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

11 reported for Gemma 3n E4B · 11 for Phi 4 Reasoning Plus

No common benchmarks found

Gemma 3n E4B and Phi 4 Reasoning Plusdon't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

6.0B diff

Phi 4 Reasoning Plus has 6.0B more parameters than Gemma 3n E4B, making it 75.0% larger.

Google
Gemma 3n E4B
8.0Bparameters
Microsoft
Phi 4 Reasoning Plus
14.0Bparameters
8.0B
Gemma 3n E4B
14.0B
Phi 4 Reasoning Plus

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Gemma 3n E4B supports multimodal inputs, whereas Phi 4 Reasoning Plus does not.

Gemma 3n E4B can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Gemma 3n E4B

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Phi 4 Reasoning Plus

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Gemma 3n E4B is licensed under a proprietary license, while Phi 4 Reasoning Plus uses MIT.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Gemma 3n E4B

Proprietary

Closed source

Phi 4 Reasoning Plus

MIT

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Gemma 3n E4B was released on 2025-06-26, while Phi 4 Reasoning Plus was released on 2025-04-30.

Gemma 3n E4B is 2 months newer than Phi 4 Reasoning Plus.

Gemma 3n E4B

Jun 26, 2025

1.2 years ago

1mo newer
Phi 4 Reasoning Plus

Apr 30, 2025

1.4 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Gemma 3n E4B has a knowledge cutoff of 2024-06-01, while Phi 4 Reasoning Plus has a cutoff of 2025-03-01.

Phi 4 Reasoning Plus has more recent training data (up to 2025-03-01), making it potentially better informed about events through that date compared to Gemma 3n E4B (2024-06-01).

Gemma 3n E4B

Jun 2024

Phi 4 Reasoning Plus

Mar 2025

9 mo newer

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Gemma 3n E4B and Phi 4 Reasoning Plus side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Gemma 3n E4B
✓ Preferred
Phi 4 Reasoning Plus
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Gemma 3n E4B vs Phi 4 Reasoning Plus.

Which is better, Gemma 3n E4B or Phi 4 Reasoning Plus?

Phi 4 Reasoning Plus leads the LLM Stats Score 15.2 to -6.0. Gemma 3n E4B is made by Google and Phi 4 Reasoning Plus is made by Microsoft. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Gemma 3n E4B compare to Phi 4 Reasoning Plus in benchmarks?

Gemma 3n E4B scores ARC-E: 81.6%, BoolQ: 81.6%, PIQA: 81.0%, HellaSwag: 78.6%, Winogrande: 71.7%. Phi 4 Reasoning Plus scores FlenQA: 97.9%, HumanEval+: 92.3%, IFEval: 84.9%, OmniMath: 81.9%, AIME 2024: 81.3%.

What are the main differences between Gemma 3n E4B and Phi 4 Reasoning Plus?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (-6.0 vs 15.2), multimodal support (yes vs no), licensing (Proprietary vs MIT). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Gemma 3n E4B and Phi 4 Reasoning Plus?

Gemma 3n E4B is developed by Google and Phi 4 Reasoning Plus is developed by Microsoft.