The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Gemma 3n E4B vs Qwen2.5 14B Instruct

Qwen2.5 14B Instruct leads the LLM Stats Score 3.9 to -6.1.

Google · Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Qwen2.5 14B Instruct leads the overall LLM Stats Score 3.9 to -6.1, ranking #304 overall.

In the 1 individual benchmarks reported for both models, Qwen2.5 14B Instruct wins 1; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Gemma 3n E4B

  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Jun 2025

Choose Qwen2.5 14B Instruct

  • overall performance matters — it scores 3.9 and ranks #304 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning — it leads those capability indexes
  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 1 of 1 exact shared results
  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Core performance indexes
-6.1
#359
3.9
#304
-6.4
#351
3.3
#299
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
0 of 1
1 of 1
Input price
— / M
— / M
Output price
— / M
— / M
Context window

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

1 shared
Index
Gemma 3n E4B
Qwen2.5 14B Instruct
-2.8#311
10.6#249
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

11 reported for Gemma 3n E4B · 16 for Qwen2.5 14B Instruct

1 shared

Gemma 3n E4B outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while Qwen2.5 14B Instruct is better at 1 benchmark (ARC-C).

Qwen2.5 14B Instruct significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Tue Sep 08 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

6.7B diff

Qwen2.5 14B Instruct has 6.7B more parameters than Gemma 3n E4B, making it 83.8% larger.

Google
Gemma 3n E4B
8.0Bparameters
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen2.5 14B Instruct
14.7Bparameters
8.0B
Gemma 3n E4B
14.7B
Qwen2.5 14B Instruct

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Gemma 3n E4B supports multimodal inputs, whereas Qwen2.5 14B Instruct does not.

Gemma 3n E4B can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Gemma 3n E4B

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Qwen2.5 14B Instruct

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Gemma 3n E4B is licensed under a proprietary license, while Qwen2.5 14B Instruct uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Gemma 3n E4B

Proprietary

Closed source

Qwen2.5 14B Instruct

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Gemma 3n E4B was released on 2025-06-26, while Qwen2.5 14B Instruct was released on 2024-09-19.

Gemma 3n E4B is 9 months newer than Qwen2.5 14B Instruct.

Gemma 3n E4B

Jun 26, 2025

1.2 years ago

9mo newer
Qwen2.5 14B Instruct

Sep 19, 2024

2.0 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Gemma 3n E4B has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2024-06-01, while Qwen2.5 14B Instruct's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Gemma 3n E4B's training data extends to 2024-06-01, but cannot make a direct comparison without Qwen2.5 14B Instruct's cutoff date.

Gemma 3n E4B

Jun 2024

Qwen2.5 14B Instruct

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Gemma 3n E4B and Qwen2.5 14B Instruct side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Gemma 3n E4B
✓ Preferred
Qwen2.5 14B Instruct
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Gemma 3n E4B vs Qwen2.5 14B Instruct.

Which is better, Gemma 3n E4B or Qwen2.5 14B Instruct?

Qwen2.5 14B Instruct leads the LLM Stats Score 3.9 to -6.1. Gemma 3n E4B is made by Google and Qwen2.5 14B Instruct is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Gemma 3n E4B compare to Qwen2.5 14B Instruct in benchmarks?

Gemma 3n E4B scores ARC-E: 81.6%, BoolQ: 81.6%, PIQA: 81.0%, HellaSwag: 78.6%, Winogrande: 71.7%. Qwen2.5 14B Instruct scores GSM8k: 94.8%, HumanEval: 83.5%, MBPP: 82.0%, MATH: 80.0%, MMLU-Redux: 80.0%.

What are the main differences between Gemma 3n E4B and Qwen2.5 14B Instruct?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (-6.1 vs 3.9), multimodal support (yes vs no), licensing (Proprietary vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Gemma 3n E4B and Qwen2.5 14B Instruct?

Gemma 3n E4B is developed by Google and Qwen2.5 14B Instruct is developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team.