The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Gemma 4 12B vs MiniMax M3.1 Flash

MiniMax M3.1 Flash leads the LLM Stats Score 48.7 to 21.6.

Google · MiniMax · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

MiniMax M3.1 Flash leads the overall LLM Stats Score 48.7 to 21.6, ranking #29 overall.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Gemma 4 12B

  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

Choose MiniMax M3.1 Flash

  • overall performance matters — it scores 48.7 and ranks #29 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning — it leads those capability indexes
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Oct 2026

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Gemma 4 12B
Google
MiniMax M3.1 Flash
MiniMax
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
21.6
#205
48.7
#29
Reasoning
22.5
#192
45.9
#32
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
—
—
Input price
— / M
$0.15 / M
Output price
— / M
$0.60 / M
Context window
—
1,000,000

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

2 shared
Index
Gemma 4 12B
MiniMax M3.1 Flash
Vision
10.9#131
28.9#42
Multimodal
16.9#96
30.2#38
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

15 reported for Gemma 4 12B · 15 for MiniMax M3.1 Flash

No common benchmarks found

Gemma 4 12B and MiniMax M3.1 Flashdon't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only MiniMax M3.1 Flash specifies input context (1,000,000 tokens). Only MiniMax M3.1 Flash specifies output context (524,288 tokens).

Google
Gemma 4 12B
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
MiniMax
MiniMax M3.1 Flash
Input1,000,000 tokens
Output524,288 tokens
Tue Oct 27 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Both Gemma 4 12B and MiniMax M3.1 Flash support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

Gemma 4 12B

Text
Images
Audio
Video

MiniMax M3.1 Flash

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Gemma 4 12B is licensed under Apache 2.0, while MiniMax M3.1 Flash uses a proprietary license.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Gemma 4 12B

Apache 2.0

Open weights

MiniMax M3.1 Flash

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Gemma 4 12B was released on 2026-05-23, while MiniMax M3.1 Flash was released on 2026-10-19.

MiniMax M3.1 Flash is 5 months newer than Gemma 4 12B.

Gemma 4 12B

May 23, 2026

5 months ago

MiniMax M3.1 Flash

Oct 19, 2026

1 weeks ago

4mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Gemma 4 12B has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2025-01-01, while MiniMax M3.1 Flash's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Gemma 4 12B's training data extends to 2025-01-01, but cannot make a direct comparison without MiniMax M3.1 Flash's cutoff date.

Gemma 4 12B

Jan 2025

MiniMax M3.1 Flash

—

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Gemma 4 12B and MiniMax M3.1 Flash side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Gemma 4 12B
✓ Preferred
MiniMax M3.1 Flash
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Gemma 4 12B vs MiniMax M3.1 Flash.

Which is better, Gemma 4 12B or MiniMax M3.1 Flash?

MiniMax M3.1 Flash leads the LLM Stats Score 48.7 to 21.6. Gemma 4 12B is made by Google and MiniMax M3.1 Flash is made by MiniMax. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Gemma 4 12B compare to MiniMax M3.1 Flash in benchmarks?

Gemma 4 12B scores FLEURS: 93.1%, MMMLU: 83.4%, MathVision: 79.7%, GPQA: 78.8%, AIME 2026: 77.5%. MiniMax M3.1 Flash scores BabyVision: 91.0%, CharXiv-R: 82.5%, CyberGym: 82.2%, BankerToolBench: 76.2%, DeepSWE 1.1: 73.7%.

What are the context window sizes for Gemma 4 12B and MiniMax M3.1 Flash?

Gemma 4 12B supports an unknown number of tokens and MiniMax M3.1 Flash supports 1.0M tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Gemma 4 12B and MiniMax M3.1 Flash?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (21.6 vs 48.7), licensing (Apache 2.0 vs Proprietary). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Gemma 4 12B and MiniMax M3.1 Flash?

Gemma 4 12B is developed by Google and MiniMax M3.1 Flash is developed by MiniMax.

Related comparisons