The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Gemma 4 12B vs o1-pro

Gemma 4 12B and o1-pro are closely matched at 22.0 and 19.7 on the LLM Stats Score.

Google · OpenAI · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Gemma 4 12B and o1-pro are closely matched on the overall LLM Stats Score at 22.0 and 19.7.

In the 1 individual benchmarks reported for both models, o1-pro wins 1; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Gemma 4 12B

  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped May 2026
  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

Choose o1-pro

  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 1 of 1 exact shared results

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Core performance indexes
22.0
#179
19.7
#199
23.0
#166
20.0
#189
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
0 of 1
1 of 1
Input price
— / M
— / M
Output price
— / M
— / M
Context window

Individual benchmarks

15 reported for Gemma 4 12B · 2 for o1-pro

1 shared

Gemma 4 12B outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while o1-pro is better at 1 benchmark (GPQA).

o1-pro significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Fri Sep 11 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Both Gemma 4 12B and o1-pro support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

Gemma 4 12B

Text
Images
Audio
Video

o1-pro

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Gemma 4 12B is licensed under Apache 2.0, while o1-pro uses a proprietary license.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Gemma 4 12B

Apache 2.0

Open weights

o1-pro

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Gemma 4 12B was released on 2026-05-23, while o1-pro was released on 2024-12-17.

Gemma 4 12B is 17 months newer than o1-pro.

Gemma 4 12B

May 23, 2026

3 months ago

1.4yr newer
o1-pro

Dec 17, 2024

1.7 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Gemma 4 12B has a knowledge cutoff of 2025-01-01, while o1-pro has a cutoff of 2023-09-30.

Gemma 4 12B has more recent training data (up to 2025-01-01), making it potentially better informed about events through that date compared to o1-pro (2023-09-30).

Gemma 4 12B

Jan 2025

1.3 yr newer
o1-pro

Sep 2023

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Gemma 4 12B and o1-pro side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Gemma 4 12B
✓ Preferred
o1-pro
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Gemma 4 12B vs o1-pro.

Which is better, Gemma 4 12B or o1-pro?

Gemma 4 12B and o1-pro are closely matched on the LLM Stats Score at 22.0 and 19.7. Gemma 4 12B is made by Google and o1-pro is made by OpenAI. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Gemma 4 12B compare to o1-pro in benchmarks?

Gemma 4 12B scores FLEURS: 93.1%, MMMLU: 83.4%, MathVision: 79.7%, GPQA: 78.8%, AIME 2026: 77.5%. o1-pro scores AIME 2024: 86.0%, GPQA: 79.0%.

What are the main differences between Gemma 4 12B and o1-pro?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (22.0 vs 19.7), licensing (Apache 2.0 vs Proprietary). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Gemma 4 12B and o1-pro?

Gemma 4 12B is developed by Google and o1-pro is developed by OpenAI.