The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Gemma 4 31B vs Muse Wonder

Muse Wonder leads the LLM Stats Score 47.9 to 33.0. Gemma 4 31B is 52.5x cheaper per token.

Google · Meta · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Muse Wonder leads the overall LLM Stats Score 47.9 to 33.0, ranking #29 overall.

On price, Gemma 4 31B is roughly 52.5x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.

Muse Wonder also accepts a larger context window (1,048,576 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Gemma 4 31B

  • cost matters — it's about 52.5x cheaper per token
  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

Choose Muse Wonder

  • overall performance matters — it scores 47.9 and ranks #29 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes agents — it leads those capability indexes
  • you process long inputs — it offers a 1,048,576 token context window
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Oct 2026

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Gemma 4 31B
Google
Muse Wonder
Meta
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
33.0
#115
47.9
#29
Reasoning
33.6
#106
33.1
#109
Agents
13.5
#106
34.1
#24
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
—
—
Input price
$0.09 / M
$4.00 / M
Output price
$0.34 / M
$20.00 / M
Context window
262,144
1,048,576

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

2 shared
Index
Gemma 4 31B
Muse Wonder
Vision
19.5#83
25.4#53
Multimodal
22.2#70
25.4#52
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

12 reported for Gemma 4 31B · 16 for Muse Wonder

No common benchmarks found

Gemma 4 31B and Muse Wonderdon't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Gemma 4 31B costs less

For input processing, Gemma 4 31B ($0.09/1M tokens) is 44.4x cheaper than Muse Wonder ($4.00/1M tokens).

For output processing, Gemma 4 31B ($0.34/1M tokens) is 58.8x cheaper than Muse Wonder ($20.00/1M tokens).

In conclusion, Muse Wonder is more expensive than Gemma 4 31B.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Sat Oct 17 2026 • llm-stats.com
Google
Gemma 4 31B
Input tokens$0.09
Output tokens$0.34
Best providerDeepinfra
Meta
Muse Wonder
Input tokens$4.00
Output tokens$20.00
Best providerMeta
Notice missing or incorrect data?

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Muse Wonder accepts 1,048,576 input tokens compared to Gemma 4 31B's 262,144 tokens. Only Gemma 4 31B specifies output context (262,144 tokens).

Google
Gemma 4 31B
Input262,144 tokens
Output262,144 tokens
Meta
Muse Wonder
Input1,048,576 tokens
Output- tokens
Sat Oct 17 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Both Gemma 4 31B and Muse Wonder support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

Gemma 4 31B

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Muse Wonder

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Gemma 4 31B is licensed under Apache 2.0, while Muse Wonder uses a proprietary license.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Gemma 4 31B

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Muse Wonder

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Gemma 4 31B was released on 2026-04-02, while Muse Wonder was released on 2026-10-12.

Muse Wonder is 6 months newer than Gemma 4 31B.

Gemma 4 31B

Apr 2, 2026

6 months ago

Muse Wonder

Oct 12, 2026

5 days ago

6mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Gemma 4 31B has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2025-01-01, while Muse Wonder's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Gemma 4 31B's training data extends to 2025-01-01, but cannot make a direct comparison without Muse Wonder's cutoff date.

Gemma 4 31B

Jan 2025

Muse Wonder

—

Provider Availability

Gemma 4 31B is available from DeepInfra, FriendliAI, Novita, Together. Muse Wonder is available from Meta Model API.

Gemma 4 31B

deepinfra logo
Deepinfra
Input Price:Input: $0.09/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.34/1M
friendli logo
FriendliAI
Input Price:Input: $0.14/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.40/1M
novita logo
Novita
Input Price:Input: $0.14/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.40/1M
together logo
Together
Input Price:Input: $0.39/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.97/1M

Muse Wonder

meta logo
Meta
Input Price:Input: $4.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $20.00/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Gemma 4 31B and Muse Wonder side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Gemma 4 31B
✓ Preferred
Muse Wonder
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Gemma 4 31B vs Muse Wonder.

Which is better, Gemma 4 31B or Muse Wonder?

Muse Wonder leads the LLM Stats Score 47.9 to 33.0. Gemma 4 31B is made by Google and Muse Wonder is made by Meta. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Gemma 4 31B compare to Muse Wonder in benchmarks?

Gemma 4 31B scores AIME 2026: 89.2%, MMMLU: 88.4%, t2-bench: 86.4%, MathVision: 85.6%, MMLU-Pro: 85.2%. Muse Wonder scores MemoryBench: 85.6%, DeepSWE 1.1: 78.8%, OSWorld 2.1 (partial): 72.6%, JobBench: 70.5%, HealthBench Professional: 60.5%.

Is Gemma 4 31B cheaper than Muse Wonder?

Gemma 4 31B is 44.4x cheaper for input tokens. Gemma 4 31B costs $0.09/M input and $0.34/M output via deepinfra. Muse Wonder costs $4.00/M input and $20.00/M output via meta.

What are the context window sizes for Gemma 4 31B and Muse Wonder?

Gemma 4 31B supports 262K tokens and Muse Wonder supports 1.0M tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Gemma 4 31B and Muse Wonder?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (33.0 vs 47.9), context window (262K vs 1.0M), input pricing ($0.09 vs $4.00/M), licensing (Apache 2.0 vs Proprietary). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Gemma 4 31B and Muse Wonder?

Gemma 4 31B is developed by Google and Muse Wonder is developed by Meta.

Related comparisons