The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Gemma 4 E2B vs Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)

Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B) leads the LLM Stats Score 21.8 to 6.3.

Google · NVIDIA · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B) leads the overall LLM Stats Score 21.8 to 6.3, ranking #203 overall.

In the 1 individual benchmarks reported for both models, Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B) wins 1; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Gemma 4 E2B

  • you are already invested in the Google ecosystem

Choose Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)

  • overall performance matters — it scores 21.8 and ranks #203 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning — it leads those capability indexes
  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 1 of 1 exact shared results
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Oct 2026

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Gemma 4 E2B
Google
Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)
NVIDIA
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
6.3
#317
21.8
#203
Reasoning
5.1
#318
19.6
#216
Agents
-3.6
#206
-1.8
#203
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
0 of 1
1 of 1
Input price
— / M
— / M
Output price
— / M
— / M
Context window
—
—

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

1 shared
Index
Gemma 4 E2B
Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)
Math
5.7#283
12.1#246
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

11 reported for Gemma 4 E2B · 10 for Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)

1 shared

Gemma 4 E2B outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B) is better at 1 benchmark (GPQA).

Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B) significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Sat Oct 24 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

1.1B diff

Gemma 4 E2B has 1.1B more parameters than Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B), making it 27.5% larger.

Google
Gemma 4 E2B
5.1Bparameters
NVIDIA
Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)
4.0Bparameters
5.1B
Gemma 4 E2B
4.0B
Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Gemma 4 E2B supports multimodal inputs, whereas Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B) does not.

Gemma 4 E2B can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Gemma 4 E2B

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Gemma 4 E2B is licensed under Apache 2.0, while Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B) uses OpenMDW License v1.1.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Gemma 4 E2B

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)

OpenMDW License v1.1

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Gemma 4 E2B was released on 2026-04-02, while Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B) was released on 2026-10-16.

Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B) is 7 months newer than Gemma 4 E2B.

Gemma 4 E2B

Apr 2, 2026

6 months ago

Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)

Oct 16, 2026

6 days ago

6mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Gemma 4 E2B has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2025-01-01, while Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)'s cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Gemma 4 E2B's training data extends to 2025-01-01, but cannot make a direct comparison without Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)'s cutoff date.

Gemma 4 E2B

Jan 2025

Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)

—

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Gemma 4 E2B and Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B) side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Gemma 4 E2B
✓ Preferred
Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Gemma 4 E2B vs Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B).

Which is better, Gemma 4 E2B or Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)?

Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B) leads the LLM Stats Score 21.8 to 6.3. Gemma 4 E2B is made by Google and Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B) is made by NVIDIA. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Gemma 4 E2B compare to Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B) in benchmarks?

Gemma 4 E2B scores MMMLU: 67.4%, MMLU-Pro: 60.0%, MathVision: 52.4%, MMMU-Pro: 44.2%, LiveCodeBench v6: 44.0%. Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B) scores IFBench: 77.9%, GPQA: 72.4%, AA-LCR: 71.0%, SWE-Bench Verified: 59.5%, SciCode: 34.9%.

What are the main differences between Gemma 4 E2B and Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (6.3 vs 21.8), multimodal support (yes vs no), licensing (Apache 2.0 vs OpenMDW License v1.1). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Gemma 4 E2B and Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)?

Gemma 4 E2B is developed by Google and Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B) is developed by NVIDIA.

Related comparisons