The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Gemma 4 E2B vs Parse

Comparing Gemma 4 E2B and Parse across benchmarks, pricing, and capabilities.

Google · Cohere · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Gemma 4 E2B and Parse trade strengths across price, capabilities, and technical limits. The better choice depends on the workload.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Gemma 4 E2B

  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

Choose Parse

  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Aug 2026

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Gemma 4 E2B
Google
Parse
Cohere
Benchmark wins
—
—
Input price
— / M
— / M
Output price
— / M
— / M
Context window
—
8,192

Individual benchmarks

11 reported for Gemma 4 E2B · 1 for Parse

No common benchmarks found

Gemma 4 E2B and Parsedon't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

2.8B diff

Gemma 4 E2B has 2.8B more parameters than Parse, making it 121.7% larger.

Google
Gemma 4 E2B
5.1Bparameters
Cohere
Parse
2.3Bparameters
5.1B
Gemma 4 E2B
2.3B
Parse

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Parse specifies input context (8,192 tokens).

Google
Gemma 4 E2B
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Cohere
Parse
Input8,192 tokens
Output- tokens
Tue Sep 22 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Both Gemma 4 E2B and Parse support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

Gemma 4 E2B

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Parse

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Gemma 4 E2B is licensed under Apache 2.0, while Parse uses a proprietary license.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Gemma 4 E2B

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Parse

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Gemma 4 E2B was released on 2026-04-02, while Parse was released on 2026-08-27.

Parse is 5 months newer than Gemma 4 E2B.

Gemma 4 E2B

Apr 2, 2026

5 months ago

Parse

Aug 27, 2026

3 weeks ago

4mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Gemma 4 E2B has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2025-01-01, while Parse's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Gemma 4 E2B's training data extends to 2025-01-01, but cannot make a direct comparison without Parse's cutoff date.

Gemma 4 E2B

Jan 2025

Parse

—

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Gemma 4 E2B and Parse side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Gemma 4 E2B
✓ Preferred
Parse
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Gemma 4 E2B vs Parse.

Which is better, Gemma 4 E2B or Parse?

Gemma 4 E2B (Google) and Parse (Cohere) each have strengths in different areas. Compare their benchmark scores, pricing, context windows, and capabilities above to determine which fits your needs.

How does Gemma 4 E2B compare to Parse in benchmarks?

Gemma 4 E2B scores MMMLU: 67.4%, MMLU-Pro: 60.0%, MathVision: 52.4%, MMMU-Pro: 44.2%, LiveCodeBench v6: 44.0%. Parse scores ParseBench: 79.2%.

What are the context window sizes for Gemma 4 E2B and Parse?

Gemma 4 E2B supports an unknown number of tokens and Parse supports 8K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Gemma 4 E2B and Parse?

Key differences include licensing (Apache 2.0 vs Proprietary). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Gemma 4 E2B and Parse?

Gemma 4 E2B is developed by Google and Parse is developed by Cohere.

Related comparisons