The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Gemma 4 E4B vs MedGemma 4B IT

Gemma 4 E4B and MedGemma 4B IT are closely matched at 13.9 and -4.5 on the LLM Stats Score.

Google · Google · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Gemma 4 E4B and MedGemma 4B IT are closely matched on the overall LLM Stats Score at 13.9 and -4.5.

In the 1 individual benchmarks reported for both models, Gemma 4 E4B wins 1; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Gemma 4 E4B

  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 1 of 1 exact shared results
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Apr 2026

Choose MedGemma 4B IT

  • you are already invested in the Google ecosystem

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Core performance indexes
13.9
#239
-4.5
#347
13.7
#232
-5.0
#344
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
1 of 1
0 of 1
Input price
$0.02 / M
— / M
Output price
$0.10 / M
— / M
Context window
131,072

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

2 shared
Index
Gemma 4 E4B
MedGemma 4B IT
3.8#159
-6.8#201
6.2#132
-5.4#162
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

11 reported for Gemma 4 E4B · 7 for MedGemma 4B IT

1 shared

Gemma 4 E4B outperforms in 1 benchmarks (MedXpertQA), while MedGemma 4B IT is better at 0 benchmarks.

Gemma 4 E4B significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Tue Sep 08 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

3.7B diff

Gemma 4 E4B has 3.7B more parameters than MedGemma 4B IT, making it 86.0% larger.

Google
Gemma 4 E4B
8.0Bparameters
Google
MedGemma 4B IT
4.3Bparameters
8.0B
Gemma 4 E4B
4.3B
MedGemma 4B IT

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Gemma 4 E4B specifies input context (131,072 tokens). Only Gemma 4 E4B specifies output context (131,072 tokens).

Google
Gemma 4 E4B
Input131,072 tokens
Output131,072 tokens
Google
MedGemma 4B IT
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Tue Sep 08 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Both Gemma 4 E4B and MedGemma 4B IT support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

Gemma 4 E4B

Text
Images
Audio
Video

MedGemma 4B IT

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Gemma 4 E4B is licensed under Apache 2.0, while MedGemma 4B IT uses Health AI Developer Foundations terms of use.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Gemma 4 E4B

Apache 2.0

Open weights

MedGemma 4B IT

Health AI Developer Foundations terms of use

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Gemma 4 E4B was released on 2026-04-02, while MedGemma 4B IT was released on 2025-05-20.

Gemma 4 E4B is 11 months newer than MedGemma 4B IT.

Gemma 4 E4B

Apr 2, 2026

5 months ago

10mo newer
MedGemma 4B IT

May 20, 2025

1.3 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Gemma 4 E4B has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2025-01-01, while MedGemma 4B IT's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Gemma 4 E4B's training data extends to 2025-01-01, but cannot make a direct comparison without MedGemma 4B IT's cutoff date.

Gemma 4 E4B

Jan 2025

MedGemma 4B IT

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Gemma 4 E4B and MedGemma 4B IT side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Gemma 4 E4B
✓ Preferred
MedGemma 4B IT
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Gemma 4 E4B vs MedGemma 4B IT.

Which is better, Gemma 4 E4B or MedGemma 4B IT?

Gemma 4 E4B and MedGemma 4B IT are closely matched on the LLM Stats Score at 13.9 and -4.5. Gemma 4 E4B is made by Google and MedGemma 4B IT is made by Google. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Gemma 4 E4B compare to MedGemma 4B IT in benchmarks?

Gemma 4 E4B scores MMMLU: 76.6%, MMLU-Pro: 69.4%, MathVision: 59.5%, GPQA: 58.6%, t2-bench: 57.5%. MedGemma 4B IT scores MIMIC CXR: 88.9%, DermMCQA: 71.8%, PathMCQA: 69.8%, SlakeVQA: 62.3%, VQA-Rad: 49.9%.

What are the context window sizes for Gemma 4 E4B and MedGemma 4B IT?

Gemma 4 E4B supports 131K tokens and MedGemma 4B IT supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Gemma 4 E4B and MedGemma 4B IT?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (13.9 vs -4.5), licensing (Apache 2.0 vs Health AI Developer Foundations terms of use). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.