The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

GLM-4.5-Air vs Muse Wonder

Muse Wonder leads the LLM Stats Score 49.2 to 24.0.

Zhipu AI · Meta · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Muse Wonder leads the overall LLM Stats Score 49.2 to 24.0, ranking #25 overall.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose GLM-4.5-Air

  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

Choose Muse Wonder

  • overall performance matters — it scores 49.2 and ranks #25 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning and coding — it leads those capability indexes
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Oct 2026

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

GLM-4.5-Air
Zhipu AI
Muse Wonder
Meta
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
24.0
#187
49.2
#25
Reasoning
23.5
#185
37.7
#81
Coding
10.9
#181
38.2
#21
Agents
5.8
#164
37.2
#17
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
—
—
Input price
— / M
— / M
Output price
— / M
— / M
Context window
—
—

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

1 shared
Index
GLM-4.5-Air
Muse Wonder
Tool use
20.1#68
19.1#75
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

14 reported for GLM-4.5-Air · 16 for Muse Wonder

No common benchmarks found

GLM-4.5-Air and Muse Wonderdon't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Muse Wonder supports multimodal inputs, whereas GLM-4.5-Air does not.

Muse Wonder can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

GLM-4.5-Air

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Muse Wonder

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

GLM-4.5-Air is licensed under MIT, while Muse Wonder uses a proprietary license.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

GLM-4.5-Air

MIT

Open weights

Muse Wonder

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

GLM-4.5-Air was released on 2025-07-28, while Muse Wonder was released on 2026-10-12.

Muse Wonder is 15 months newer than GLM-4.5-Air.

GLM-4.5-Air

Jul 28, 2025

1.2 years ago

Muse Wonder

Oct 12, 2026

5 days ago

1.2yr newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against GLM-4.5-Air and Muse Wonder side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

GLM-4.5-Air
✓ Preferred
Muse Wonder
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about GLM-4.5-Air vs Muse Wonder.

Which is better, GLM-4.5-Air or Muse Wonder?

Muse Wonder leads the LLM Stats Score 49.2 to 24.0. GLM-4.5-Air is made by Zhipu AI and Muse Wonder is made by Meta. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does GLM-4.5-Air compare to Muse Wonder in benchmarks?

GLM-4.5-Air scores MATH-500: 98.1%, AIME 2024: 89.4%, MMLU-Pro: 81.4%, TAU-bench Retail: 77.9%, BFCL-v3: 76.4%. Muse Wonder scores MemoryBench: 85.6%, DeepSWE 1.1: 78.8%, OSWorld 2.1 (partial): 72.6%, JobBench: 70.5%, HealthBench Professional: 60.5%.

What are the main differences between GLM-4.5-Air and Muse Wonder?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (24.0 vs 49.2), multimodal support (no vs yes), licensing (MIT vs Proprietary). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes GLM-4.5-Air and Muse Wonder?

GLM-4.5-Air is developed by Zhipu AI and Muse Wonder is developed by Meta.

Related comparisons