The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Muse Wonder vs Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B)

Muse Wonder leads the LLM Stats Score 49.2 to 35.0.

Meta · NVIDIA · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Muse Wonder leads the overall LLM Stats Score 49.2 to 35.0, ranking #25 overall.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Muse Wonder

  • overall performance matters — it scores 49.2 and ranks #25 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes coding and agents — it leads those capability indexes

Choose Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B)

  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Oct 2026
  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Muse Wonder
Meta
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B)
NVIDIA
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
49.2
#25
35.0
#108
Reasoning
37.7
#81
36.2
#94
Coding
38.2
#21
21.0
#108
Agents
37.2
#17
16.5
#99
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
—
—
Input price
— / M
$0.20 / M
Output price
— / M
$1.00 / M
Context window
—
262,144

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

3 shared
Index
Muse Wonder
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B)
Vision
26.6#53
20.3#86
Tool use
19.1#75
11.0#133
Multimodal
26.6#53
22.0#76
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

16 reported for Muse Wonder · 19 for Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B)

No common benchmarks found

Muse Wonder and Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B)don't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) specifies input context (262,144 tokens). Only Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) specifies output context (262,144 tokens).

Meta
Muse Wonder
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
NVIDIA
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B)
Input262,144 tokens
Output262,144 tokens
Mon Oct 19 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Both Muse Wonder and Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

Muse Wonder

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B)

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Muse Wonder is licensed under a proprietary license, while Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) uses OpenMDW License v1.1.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Muse Wonder

Proprietary

Closed source

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B)

OpenMDW License v1.1

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Muse Wonder was released on 2026-10-12, while Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) was released on 2026-10-15.

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) is 0 month newer than Muse Wonder.

Muse Wonder

Oct 12, 2026

1 weeks ago

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B)

Oct 15, 2026

4 days ago

3d newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Muse Wonder and Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Muse Wonder
✓ Preferred
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B)
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Muse Wonder vs Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B).

Which is better, Muse Wonder or Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B)?

Muse Wonder leads the LLM Stats Score 49.2 to 35.0. Muse Wonder is made by Meta and Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) is made by NVIDIA. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Muse Wonder compare to Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) in benchmarks?

Muse Wonder scores MemoryBench: 85.6%, DeepSWE 1.1: 78.8%, OSWorld 2.1 (partial): 72.6%, JobBench: 70.5%, HealthBench Professional: 60.5%. Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) scores GPQA: 89.5%, LiveCodeBench v6: 88.2%, CharXiv-R: 80.8%, MathVision: 78.2%, BrowseComp: 78.0%.

What are the context window sizes for Muse Wonder and Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B)?

Muse Wonder supports an unknown number of tokens and Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) supports 262K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Muse Wonder and Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B)?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (49.2 vs 35.0), licensing (Proprietary vs OpenMDW License v1.1). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Muse Wonder and Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B)?

Muse Wonder is developed by Meta and Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) is developed by NVIDIA.

Related comparisons