The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

GLM-4.7 vs MiniMax M3.1 Flash

MiniMax M3.1 Flash leads the LLM Stats Score 48.5 to 34.1. MiniMax M3.1 Flash is 2.8x cheaper per token.

Zhipu AI · MiniMax · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

MiniMax M3.1 Flash leads the overall LLM Stats Score 48.5 to 34.1, ranking #29 overall.

On price, MiniMax M3.1 Flash is roughly 2.8x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.

MiniMax M3.1 Flash also accepts a larger context window (1,000,000 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose GLM-4.7

  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

Choose MiniMax M3.1 Flash

  • overall performance matters — it scores 48.5 and ranks #29 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning and coding — it leads those capability indexes
  • cost matters — it's about 2.8x cheaper per token
  • you process long inputs — it offers a 1,000,000 token context window
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Oct 2026

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

GLM-4.7
Zhipu AI
MiniMax M3.1 Flash
MiniMax
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
34.1
#112
48.5
#29
Reasoning
34.1
#108
45.8
#34
Coding
17.4
#137
37.8
#23
Agents
9.4
#145
35.6
#23
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
—
—
Input price
$0.40 / M
$0.15 / M
Output price
$1.75 / M
$0.60 / M
Context window
202,752
1,000,000

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

1 shared
Index
GLM-4.7
MiniMax M3.1 Flash
Tool use
8.3#156
26.8#30
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

13 reported for GLM-4.7 · 14 for MiniMax M3.1 Flash

No common benchmarks found

GLM-4.7 and MiniMax M3.1 Flashdon't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

MiniMax M3.1 Flash costs less

For input processing, GLM-4.7 ($0.40/1M tokens) is 2.7x more expensive than MiniMax M3.1 Flash ($0.15/1M tokens).

For output processing, GLM-4.7 ($1.75/1M tokens) is 2.9x more expensive than MiniMax M3.1 Flash ($0.60/1M tokens).

In conclusion, GLM-4.7 is more expensive than MiniMax M3.1 Flash.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Mon Oct 19 2026 • llm-stats.com
Zhipu AI
GLM-4.7
Input tokens$0.40
Output tokens$1.75
Best providerDeepinfra
MiniMax
MiniMax M3.1 Flash
Input tokens$0.15
Output tokens$0.60
Best providerMiniMax
Notice missing or incorrect data?

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

MiniMax M3.1 Flash accepts 1,000,000 input tokens compared to GLM-4.7's 202,752 tokens. MiniMax M3.1 Flash can generate longer responses up to 524,288 tokens, while GLM-4.7 is limited to 202,752 tokens.

Zhipu AI
GLM-4.7
Input202,752 tokens
Output202,752 tokens
MiniMax
MiniMax M3.1 Flash
Input1,000,000 tokens
Output524,288 tokens
Mon Oct 19 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Both GLM-4.7 and MiniMax M3.1 Flash support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

GLM-4.7

Text
Images
Audio
Video

MiniMax M3.1 Flash

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

GLM-4.7 is licensed under MIT, while MiniMax M3.1 Flash uses a proprietary license.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

GLM-4.7

MIT

Open weights

MiniMax M3.1 Flash

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

GLM-4.7 was released on 2025-12-22, while MiniMax M3.1 Flash was released on 2026-10-19.

MiniMax M3.1 Flash is 10 months newer than GLM-4.7.

GLM-4.7

Dec 22, 2025

10 months ago

MiniMax M3.1 Flash

Oct 19, 2026

0 days ago

10mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Provider Availability

GLM-4.7 is available from DeepInfra, Fireworks, Novita. MiniMax M3.1 Flash is available from MiniMax.

GLM-4.7

deepinfra logo
Deepinfra
Input Price:Input: $0.40/1MOutput Price:Output: $1.75/1M
fireworks logo
Fireworks
Input Price:Input: $0.60/1MOutput Price:Output: $2.20/1M
novita logo
Novita
Input Price:Input: $0.60/1MOutput Price:Output: $2.20/1M

MiniMax M3.1 Flash

minimax logo
MiniMax
Input Price:Input: $0.15/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.60/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against GLM-4.7 and MiniMax M3.1 Flash side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

GLM-4.7
✓ Preferred
MiniMax M3.1 Flash
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about GLM-4.7 vs MiniMax M3.1 Flash.

Which is better, GLM-4.7 or MiniMax M3.1 Flash?

MiniMax M3.1 Flash leads the LLM Stats Score 48.5 to 34.1. GLM-4.7 is made by Zhipu AI and MiniMax M3.1 Flash is made by MiniMax. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does GLM-4.7 compare to MiniMax M3.1 Flash in benchmarks?

GLM-4.7 scores AIME 2025: 95.7%, Tau-bench: 87.4%, GPQA: 85.7%, LiveCodeBench v6: 84.9%, MMLU-Pro: 84.3%. MiniMax M3.1 Flash scores BabyVision: 91.0%, CharXiv-R: 82.5%, CyberGym: 82.2%, BankerToolBench: 76.2%, DeepSWE 1.1: 73.7%.

Is GLM-4.7 cheaper than MiniMax M3.1 Flash?

MiniMax M3.1 Flash is 2.7x cheaper for input tokens. GLM-4.7 costs $0.40/M input and $1.75/M output via deepinfra. MiniMax M3.1 Flash costs $0.15/M input and $0.60/M output via minimax.

What are the context window sizes for GLM-4.7 and MiniMax M3.1 Flash?

GLM-4.7 supports 203K tokens and MiniMax M3.1 Flash supports 1.0M tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between GLM-4.7 and MiniMax M3.1 Flash?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (34.1 vs 48.5), context window (203K vs 1.0M), input pricing ($0.40 vs $0.15/M), licensing (MIT vs Proprietary). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes GLM-4.7 and MiniMax M3.1 Flash?

GLM-4.7 is developed by Zhipu AI and MiniMax M3.1 Flash is developed by MiniMax.

Related comparisons