The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

GLM-5.3 vs o3

GLM-5.3 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. GLM-5.3 is 1.6x cheaper per token.

Zhipu AI · OpenAI · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

GLM-5.3 outperforms in 1 benchmarks (Humanity's Last Exam), while o3 is better at 0 benchmarks. GLM-5.3 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

On price, GLM-5.3 is roughly 1.6x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.

GLM-5.3 also accepts a larger context window (1,000,000 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.

Based on current benchmark, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose GLM-5.3

  • you want the strongest raw capability — it leads on 1 of 1 shared benchmarks
  • cost matters — it's about 1.6x cheaper per token
  • you process long inputs — it offers a 1,000,000 token context window
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Aug 2026

Choose o3

  • you want predictable pricing at $2.00/M input and $8.00/M output

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Benchmark wins
1 of 1
0 of 1
Input price
$1.40 / M
$2.00 / M
Output price
$4.40 / M
$8.00 / M
Context window
1,000,000
200,000
Released
Aug 2026
Apr 2025
License
Unknown
Proprietary

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

1 benchmarks

GLM-5.3 outperforms in 1 benchmarks (Humanity's Last Exam), while o3 is better at 0 benchmarks.

GLM-5.3 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Mon Aug 24 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Playground indexes and blind preference scores

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

GLM-5.3 costs less

For input processing, GLM-5.3 ($1.40/1M tokens) is 1.4x cheaper than o3 ($2.00/1M tokens).

For output processing, GLM-5.3 ($4.40/1M tokens) is 1.8x cheaper than o3 ($8.00/1M tokens).

In conclusion, o3 is more expensive than GLM-5.3.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Mon Aug 24 2026 • llm-stats.com
Zhipu AI
GLM-5.3
Input tokens$1.40
Output tokens$4.40
Best providerUnknown Organization
OpenAI
o3
Input tokens$2.00
Output tokens$8.00
Best providerOpenAI
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

GLM-5.3 accepts 1,000,000 input tokens compared to o3's 200,000 tokens. GLM-5.3 can generate longer responses up to 128,000 tokens, while o3 is limited to 100,000 tokens.

Zhipu AI
GLM-5.3
Input1,000,000 tokens
Output128,000 tokens
OpenAI
o3
Input200,000 tokens
Output100,000 tokens
Mon Aug 24 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

o3 supports multimodal inputs, whereas GLM-5.3 does not.

o3 can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

GLM-5.3

Text
Images
Audio
Video

o3

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

GLM-5.3 was released on 2026-08-14, while o3 was released on 2025-04-16.

GLM-5.3 is 16 months newer than o3.

GLM-5.3

Aug 14, 2026

1 weeks ago

1.3yr newer
o3

Apr 16, 2025

1.4 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

o3 has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2024-05-31, while GLM-5.3's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm o3's training data extends to 2024-05-31, but cannot make a direct comparison without GLM-5.3's cutoff date.

GLM-5.3

o3

May 2024

Provider Availability

GLM-5.3 is available from ZAI. o3 is available from OpenAI.

GLM-5.3

z logo
Unknown Organization
Input Price:Input: $1.40/1MOutput Price:Output: $4.40/1M

o3

openai logo
OpenAI
Input Price:Input: $2.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $8.00/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against GLM-5.3 and o3 side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

GLM-5.3
✓ Preferred
o3
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about GLM-5.3 vs o3.

Which is better, GLM-5.3 or o3?

GLM-5.3 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. GLM-5.3 is made by Zhipu AI and o3 is made by OpenAI. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.

How does GLM-5.3 compare to o3 in benchmarks?

GLM-5.3 scores Terminal-Bench 2.1: 88.2%, CyberGym: 84.5%, FrontierSWE: 78.1%, Toolathlon: 73.0%, DeepSWE 1.1: 66.9%. o3 scores COLLIE: 98.4%, AIME 2024: 91.6%, ARC-AGI: 88.0%, MathVista: 86.8%, AIME 2025: 86.4%.

Is GLM-5.3 cheaper than o3?

GLM-5.3 is 1.4x cheaper for input tokens. GLM-5.3 costs $1.40/M input and $4.40/M output via z. o3 costs $2.00/M input and $8.00/M output via openai.

What are the context window sizes for GLM-5.3 and o3?

GLM-5.3 supports 1.0M tokens and o3 supports 200K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between GLM-5.3 and o3?

Key differences include context window (1.0M vs 200K), input pricing ($1.40 vs $2.00/M), multimodal support (no vs yes), licensing (Unknown vs Proprietary). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes GLM-5.3 and o3?

GLM-5.3 is developed by Zhipu AI and o3 is developed by OpenAI.