The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

LFM2.5-VL-3B vs o3

o3 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Liquid AI · OpenAI · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

LFM2.5-VL-3B outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while o3 is better at 1 benchmark (MMMU-Pro). o3 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Based on current benchmark, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose LFM2.5-VL-3B

  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Aug 2026
  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

Choose o3

  • you want the strongest raw capability — it leads on 1 of 1 shared benchmarks

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Benchmark wins
0 of 1
1 of 1
Input price
— / M
$2.00 / M
Output price
— / M
$8.00 / M
Context window
200,000
Released
Aug 2026
Apr 2025
License
LFM Open License v1.0
Proprietary

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

1 benchmarks

LFM2.5-VL-3B outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while o3 is better at 1 benchmark (MMMU-Pro).

o3 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Mon Aug 24 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Playground indexes and blind preference scores

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only o3 specifies input context (200,000 tokens). Only o3 specifies output context (100,000 tokens).

Liquid AI
LFM2.5-VL-3B
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
OpenAI
o3
Input200,000 tokens
Output100,000 tokens
Mon Aug 24 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Both LFM2.5-VL-3B and o3 support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

LFM2.5-VL-3B

Text
Images
Audio
Video

o3

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

LFM2.5-VL-3B is licensed under LFM Open License v1.0, while o3 uses a proprietary license.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

LFM2.5-VL-3B

LFM Open License v1.0

Open weights

o3

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

LFM2.5-VL-3B was released on 2026-08-12, while o3 was released on 2025-04-16.

LFM2.5-VL-3B is 16 months newer than o3.

LFM2.5-VL-3B

Aug 12, 2026

1 weeks ago

1.3yr newer
o3

Apr 16, 2025

1.4 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

o3 has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2024-05-31, while LFM2.5-VL-3B's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm o3's training data extends to 2024-05-31, but cannot make a direct comparison without LFM2.5-VL-3B's cutoff date.

LFM2.5-VL-3B

o3

May 2024

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against LFM2.5-VL-3B and o3 side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

LFM2.5-VL-3B
✓ Preferred
o3
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about LFM2.5-VL-3B vs o3.

Which is better, LFM2.5-VL-3B or o3?

o3 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. LFM2.5-VL-3B is made by Liquid AI and o3 is made by OpenAI. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.

How does LFM2.5-VL-3B compare to o3 in benchmarks?

LFM2.5-VL-3B scores DocVQA: 91.1%, POPE: 88.7%, RefCOCO-avg: 87.9%, TextVQA: 84.3%, OCRBench: 84.2%. o3 scores COLLIE: 98.4%, AIME 2024: 91.6%, ARC-AGI: 88.0%, MathVista: 86.8%, AIME 2025: 86.4%.

What are the context window sizes for LFM2.5-VL-3B and o3?

LFM2.5-VL-3B supports an unknown number of tokens and o3 supports 200K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between LFM2.5-VL-3B and o3?

Key differences include licensing (LFM Open License v1.0 vs Proprietary). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes LFM2.5-VL-3B and o3?

LFM2.5-VL-3B is developed by Liquid AI and o3 is developed by OpenAI.