GPT-4 vs Mistral NeMo Instruct Comparison

Comparing GPT-4 and Mistral NeMo Instruct across benchmarks, pricing, and capabilities.

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

3 benchmarks

GPT-4 outperforms in 3 benchmarks (HellaSwag, MMLU, Winogrande), while Mistral NeMo Instruct is better at 0 benchmarks.

GPT-4 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Wed Mar 18 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Mistral NeMo Instruct costs less

For input processing, GPT-4 ($30.00/1M tokens) is 200.0x more expensive than Mistral NeMo Instruct ($0.15/1M tokens).

For output processing, GPT-4 ($60.00/1M tokens) is 400.0x more expensive than Mistral NeMo Instruct ($0.15/1M tokens).

In conclusion, GPT-4 is more expensive than Mistral NeMo Instruct.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Wed Mar 18 2026 • llm-stats.com
OpenAI
GPT-4
Input tokens$30.00
Output tokens$60.00
Best providerAzure
Mistral AI
Mistral NeMo Instruct
Input tokens$0.15
Output tokens$0.15
Best providerGoogle
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Mistral NeMo Instruct accepts 128,000 input tokens compared to GPT-4's 32,768 tokens. Mistral NeMo Instruct can generate longer responses up to 128,000 tokens, while GPT-4 is limited to 32,768 tokens.

OpenAI
GPT-4
Input32,768 tokens
Output32,768 tokens
Mistral AI
Mistral NeMo Instruct
Input128,000 tokens
Output128,000 tokens
Wed Mar 18 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

GPT-4 supports multimodal inputs, whereas Mistral NeMo Instruct does not.

GPT-4 can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

GPT-4

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Mistral NeMo Instruct

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

GPT-4 is licensed under a proprietary license, while Mistral NeMo Instruct uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

GPT-4

Proprietary

Closed source

Mistral NeMo Instruct

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

GPT-4 was released on 2023-06-13, while Mistral NeMo Instruct was released on 2024-07-18.

Mistral NeMo Instruct is 13 months newer than GPT-4.

GPT-4

Jun 13, 2023

2.8 years ago

Mistral NeMo Instruct

Jul 18, 2024

1.7 years ago

1.1yr newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

GPT-4 has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2022-12-31, while Mistral NeMo Instruct's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm GPT-4's training data extends to 2022-12-31, but cannot make a direct comparison without Mistral NeMo Instruct's cutoff date.

GPT-4

Dec 2022

Mistral NeMo Instruct

Provider Availability

GPT-4 is available from Azure, OpenAI. Mistral NeMo Instruct is available from Google, Mistral AI. The availability of providers can affect quality of the model and reliability.

GPT-4

azure logo
Azure
Input Price:Input: $30.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $60.00/1M
openai logo
OpenAI
Input Price:Input: $30.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $60.00/1M

Mistral NeMo Instruct

google logo
Google
Input Price:Input: $0.15/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.15/1M
mistral logo
Mistral
Input Price:Input: $0.15/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.15/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Key Takeaways

Supports multimodal inputs
Higher HellaSwag score (95.3% vs 83.5%)
Higher MMLU score (86.4% vs 68.0%)
Higher Winogrande score (87.5% vs 76.8%)
Larger context window (128,000 tokens)
Less expensive input tokens
Less expensive output tokens
Has open weights

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
OpenAI
GPT-4
Mistral AI
Mistral NeMo Instruct