The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

GPT-4 Turbo vs IBM Granite 4.2 30B

IBM Granite 4.2 30B leads the LLM Stats Score 24.0 to 9.2.

OpenAI · IBM · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

IBM Granite 4.2 30B leads the overall LLM Stats Score 24.0 to 9.2, ranking #156 overall.

In the 1 individual benchmarks reported for both models, IBM Granite 4.2 30B wins 1; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose GPT-4 Turbo

  • you want predictable pricing at $10.00/M input and $30.00/M output

Choose IBM Granite 4.2 30B

  • overall performance matters — it scores 24.0 and ranks #156 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning — it leads those capability indexes
  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 1 of 1 exact shared results
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Aug 2026
  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Core performance indexes
9.2
#256
24.0
#156
9.3
#249
21.8
#165
7.3
#174
9.6
#159
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
0 of 1
1 of 1
Input price
$10.00 / M
— / M
Output price
$30.00 / M
— / M
Context window
128,000

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

1 shared
Index
GPT-4 Turbo
IBM Granite 4.2 30B
17.4#188
25.6#103
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

6 reported for GPT-4 Turbo · 18 for IBM Granite 4.2 30B

1 shared

GPT-4 Turbo outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while IBM Granite 4.2 30B is better at 1 benchmark (GPQA).

IBM Granite 4.2 30B significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Mon Aug 31 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only GPT-4 Turbo specifies input context (128,000 tokens). Only GPT-4 Turbo specifies output context (4,096 tokens).

OpenAI
GPT-4 Turbo
Input128,000 tokens
Output4,096 tokens
IBM
IBM Granite 4.2 30B
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Mon Aug 31 2026 • llm-stats.com

License

Usage and distribution terms

GPT-4 Turbo is licensed under a proprietary license, while IBM Granite 4.2 30B uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

GPT-4 Turbo

Proprietary

Closed source

IBM Granite 4.2 30B

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

GPT-4 Turbo was released on 2024-04-09, while IBM Granite 4.2 30B was released on 2026-08-25.

IBM Granite 4.2 30B is 29 months newer than GPT-4 Turbo.

GPT-4 Turbo

Apr 9, 2024

2.4 years ago

IBM Granite 4.2 30B

Aug 25, 2026

5 days ago

2.4yr newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

GPT-4 Turbo has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2023-12-31, while IBM Granite 4.2 30B's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm GPT-4 Turbo's training data extends to 2023-12-31, but cannot make a direct comparison without IBM Granite 4.2 30B's cutoff date.

GPT-4 Turbo

Dec 2023

IBM Granite 4.2 30B

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against GPT-4 Turbo and IBM Granite 4.2 30B side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

GPT-4 Turbo
✓ Preferred
IBM Granite 4.2 30B
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about GPT-4 Turbo vs IBM Granite 4.2 30B.

Which is better, GPT-4 Turbo or IBM Granite 4.2 30B?

IBM Granite 4.2 30B leads the LLM Stats Score 24.0 to 9.2. GPT-4 Turbo is made by OpenAI and IBM Granite 4.2 30B is made by IBM. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does GPT-4 Turbo compare to IBM Granite 4.2 30B in benchmarks?

GPT-4 Turbo scores MGSM: 88.5%, HumanEval: 87.1%, MMLU: 86.5%, DROP: 86.0%, MATH: 72.6%. IBM Granite 4.2 30B scores RULER 64k: 90.0%, AIME 2025: 89.2%, HMMT25: 89.2%, RULER 128k: 81.4%, MMLU-Pro: 77.6%.

What are the context window sizes for GPT-4 Turbo and IBM Granite 4.2 30B?

GPT-4 Turbo supports 128K tokens and IBM Granite 4.2 30B supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between GPT-4 Turbo and IBM Granite 4.2 30B?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (9.2 vs 24.0), licensing (Proprietary vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes GPT-4 Turbo and IBM Granite 4.2 30B?

GPT-4 Turbo is developed by OpenAI and IBM Granite 4.2 30B is developed by IBM.