Model Comparison

GPT-4 Turbo vs Mistral NeMo InstructWhich is better in 2026?

GPT-4 Turbo significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Mistral NeMo Instruct is 100.0x cheaper per token.

Verdict: GPT-4 Turbo vs Mistral NeMo Instruct — which is better?

GPT-4 Turbo (by OpenAI) and Mistral NeMo Instruct (by Mistral AI) are two of the AI models people compare most. Here is how they stack up on benchmarks, price and capabilities, and which one to pick in 2026.

GPT-4 Turbo outperforms in 1 benchmarks (MMLU), while Mistral NeMo Instruct is better at 0 benchmarks. GPT-4 Turbo significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

On price, Mistral NeMo Instruct is roughly 100.0x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.

Choose GPT-4 Turbo if…

  • you want the strongest raw capability — it leads on 1 of 1 shared benchmarks

Choose Mistral NeMo Instruct if…

  • cost matters — it's about 100.0x cheaper per token
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Jul 2024
  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune
Want to compare interactively?Try the playground

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

1 benchmarks

GPT-4 Turbo outperforms in 1 benchmarks (MMLU), while Mistral NeMo Instruct is better at 0 benchmarks.

GPT-4 Turbo significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Sat Jun 13 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Mistral NeMo Instruct costs less

For input processing, GPT-4 Turbo ($10.00/1M tokens) is 66.7x more expensive than Mistral NeMo Instruct ($0.15/1M tokens).

For output processing, GPT-4 Turbo ($30.00/1M tokens) is 200.0x more expensive than Mistral NeMo Instruct ($0.15/1M tokens).

In conclusion, GPT-4 Turbo is more expensive than Mistral NeMo Instruct.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Sat Jun 13 2026 • llm-stats.com
OpenAI
GPT-4 Turbo
Input tokens$10.00
Output tokens$30.00
Best providerAzure
Mistral AI
Mistral NeMo Instruct
Input tokens$0.15
Output tokens$0.15
Best providerGoogle
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue→

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Both models have the same input context window of 128,000 tokens. Mistral NeMo Instruct can generate longer responses up to 128,000 tokens, while GPT-4 Turbo is limited to 4,096 tokens.

OpenAI
GPT-4 Turbo
Input128,000 tokens
Output4,096 tokens
Mistral AI
Mistral NeMo Instruct
Input128,000 tokens
Output128,000 tokens
Sat Jun 13 2026 • llm-stats.com

License

Usage and distribution terms

GPT-4 Turbo is licensed under a proprietary license, while Mistral NeMo Instruct uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

GPT-4 Turbo

Proprietary

Closed source

Mistral NeMo Instruct

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

GPT-4 Turbo was released on 2024-04-09, while Mistral NeMo Instruct was released on 2024-07-18.

Mistral NeMo Instruct is 3 months newer than GPT-4 Turbo.

GPT-4 Turbo

Apr 9, 2024

2.2 years ago

Mistral NeMo Instruct

Jul 18, 2024

1.9 years ago

3mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

GPT-4 Turbo has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2023-12-31, while Mistral NeMo Instruct's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm GPT-4 Turbo's training data extends to 2023-12-31, but cannot make a direct comparison without Mistral NeMo Instruct's cutoff date.

GPT-4 Turbo

Dec 2023

Mistral NeMo Instruct

—

Provider Availability

GPT-4 Turbo is available from Azure, OpenAI. Mistral NeMo Instruct is available from Google, Mistral AI.

GPT-4 Turbo

azure logo
Azure
Input Price:Input: $10.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $30.00/1M
openai logo
OpenAI
Input Price:Input: $10.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $30.00/1M

Mistral NeMo Instruct

google logo
Google
Input Price:Input: $0.15/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.15/1M
mistral logo
Mistral
Input Price:Input: $0.15/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.15/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Key Takeaways

OpenAI
Higher MMLU score (86.5% vs 68.0%)
Mistral AI
Less expensive input tokens
Less expensive output tokens
Has open weights

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
OpenAI
GPT-4 Turbo
Mistral AI
Mistral NeMo Instruct

FAQ

Common questions about GPT-4 Turbo vs Mistral NeMo Instruct.

Which is better, GPT-4 Turbo or Mistral NeMo Instruct?

GPT-4 Turbo significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. GPT-4 Turbo is made by OpenAI and Mistral NeMo Instruct is made by Mistral AI. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.

How does GPT-4 Turbo compare to Mistral NeMo Instruct in benchmarks?

GPT-4 Turbo scores MGSM: 88.5%, HumanEval: 87.1%, MMLU: 86.5%, DROP: 86.0%, MATH: 72.6%. Mistral NeMo Instruct scores HellaSwag: 83.5%, Winogrande: 76.8%, TriviaQA: 73.8%, CommonSenseQA: 70.4%, MMLU: 68.0%.

Is GPT-4 Turbo cheaper than Mistral NeMo Instruct?

Mistral NeMo Instruct is 66.7x cheaper for input tokens. GPT-4 Turbo costs $10.00/M input and $30.00/M output via azure. Mistral NeMo Instruct costs $0.15/M input and $0.15/M output via google.

What are the context window sizes for GPT-4 Turbo and Mistral NeMo Instruct?

GPT-4 Turbo supports 128K tokens and Mistral NeMo Instruct supports 128K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between GPT-4 Turbo and Mistral NeMo Instruct?

Key differences include input pricing ($10.00 vs $0.15/M), licensing (Proprietary vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes GPT-4 Turbo and Mistral NeMo Instruct?

GPT-4 Turbo is developed by OpenAI and Mistral NeMo Instruct is developed by Mistral AI.

Related comparisons