The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

GPT-4o mini vs IBM Granite 4.2 30B

IBM Granite 4.2 30B leads the LLM Stats Score 24.0 to 3.9.

OpenAI · IBM · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

IBM Granite 4.2 30B leads the overall LLM Stats Score 24.0 to 3.9, ranking #156 overall.

In the 2 individual benchmarks reported for both models, IBM Granite 4.2 30B wins 2; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose GPT-4o mini

  • you want predictable pricing at $0.15/M input and $0.60/M output

Choose IBM Granite 4.2 30B

  • overall performance matters — it scores 24.0 and ranks #156 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning — it leads those capability indexes
  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 2 of 2 exact shared results
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Aug 2026
  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Core performance indexes
3.9
#290
24.0
#156
4.3
#281
21.8
#165
-0.4
#231
9.6
#159
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
0 of 2
2 of 2
Input price
$0.15 / M
— / M
Output price
$0.60 / M
— / M
Context window
128,000

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

1 shared
Index
GPT-4o mini
IBM Granite 4.2 30B
11.8#232
25.6#103
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

9 reported for GPT-4o mini · 18 for IBM Granite 4.2 30B

2 shared

GPT-4o mini outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while IBM Granite 4.2 30B is better at 2 benchmarks (GPQA, SWE-Bench Verified).

IBM Granite 4.2 30B significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Mon Aug 31 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only GPT-4o mini specifies input context (128,000 tokens). Only GPT-4o mini specifies output context (16,384 tokens).

OpenAI
GPT-4o mini
Input128,000 tokens
Output16,384 tokens
IBM
IBM Granite 4.2 30B
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Mon Aug 31 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

GPT-4o mini supports multimodal inputs, whereas IBM Granite 4.2 30B does not.

GPT-4o mini can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

GPT-4o mini

Text
Images
Audio
Video

IBM Granite 4.2 30B

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

GPT-4o mini is licensed under a proprietary license, while IBM Granite 4.2 30B uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

GPT-4o mini

Proprietary

Closed source

IBM Granite 4.2 30B

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

GPT-4o mini was released on 2024-07-18, while IBM Granite 4.2 30B was released on 2026-08-25.

IBM Granite 4.2 30B is 26 months newer than GPT-4o mini.

GPT-4o mini

Jul 18, 2024

2.1 years ago

IBM Granite 4.2 30B

Aug 25, 2026

5 days ago

2.1yr newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

GPT-4o mini has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2023-10-01, while IBM Granite 4.2 30B's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm GPT-4o mini's training data extends to 2023-10-01, but cannot make a direct comparison without IBM Granite 4.2 30B's cutoff date.

GPT-4o mini

Oct 2023

IBM Granite 4.2 30B

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against GPT-4o mini and IBM Granite 4.2 30B side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

GPT-4o mini
✓ Preferred
IBM Granite 4.2 30B
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about GPT-4o mini vs IBM Granite 4.2 30B.

Which is better, GPT-4o mini or IBM Granite 4.2 30B?

IBM Granite 4.2 30B leads the LLM Stats Score 24.0 to 3.9. GPT-4o mini is made by OpenAI and IBM Granite 4.2 30B is made by IBM. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does GPT-4o mini compare to IBM Granite 4.2 30B in benchmarks?

GPT-4o mini scores HumanEval: 87.2%, MGSM: 87.0%, MMLU: 82.0%, DROP: 79.7%, MATH: 70.2%. IBM Granite 4.2 30B scores RULER 64k: 90.0%, AIME 2025: 89.2%, HMMT25: 89.2%, RULER 128k: 81.4%, MMLU-Pro: 77.6%.

What are the context window sizes for GPT-4o mini and IBM Granite 4.2 30B?

GPT-4o mini supports 128K tokens and IBM Granite 4.2 30B supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between GPT-4o mini and IBM Granite 4.2 30B?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (3.9 vs 24.0), multimodal support (yes vs no), licensing (Proprietary vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes GPT-4o mini and IBM Granite 4.2 30B?

GPT-4o mini is developed by OpenAI and IBM Granite 4.2 30B is developed by IBM.