GPT-4o mini vs Mistral NeMo Instruct Comparison

Comparing GPT-4o mini and Mistral NeMo Instruct across benchmarks, pricing, and capabilities.

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

1 benchmarks

GPT-4o mini outperforms in 1 benchmarks (MMLU), while Mistral NeMo Instruct is better at 0 benchmarks.

GPT-4o mini significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Wed Mar 18 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Mistral NeMo Instruct costs less

For input processing, GPT-4o mini ($0.15/1M tokens) costs the same as Mistral NeMo Instruct ($0.15/1M tokens).

For output processing, GPT-4o mini ($0.60/1M tokens) is 4.0x more expensive than Mistral NeMo Instruct ($0.15/1M tokens).

In conclusion, GPT-4o mini is more expensive than Mistral NeMo Instruct.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Wed Mar 18 2026 • llm-stats.com
OpenAI
GPT-4o mini
Input tokens$0.15
Output tokens$0.60
Best providerAzure
Mistral AI
Mistral NeMo Instruct
Input tokens$0.15
Output tokens$0.15
Best providerGoogle
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Both models have the same input context window of 128,000 tokens. Mistral NeMo Instruct can generate longer responses up to 128,000 tokens, while GPT-4o mini is limited to 16,384 tokens.

OpenAI
GPT-4o mini
Input128,000 tokens
Output16,384 tokens
Mistral AI
Mistral NeMo Instruct
Input128,000 tokens
Output128,000 tokens
Wed Mar 18 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

GPT-4o mini supports multimodal inputs, whereas Mistral NeMo Instruct does not.

GPT-4o mini can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

GPT-4o mini

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Mistral NeMo Instruct

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

GPT-4o mini is licensed under a proprietary license, while Mistral NeMo Instruct uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

GPT-4o mini

Proprietary

Closed source

Mistral NeMo Instruct

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Both models were released on 2024-07-18.

They likely represent similar generations of model development.

GPT-4o mini

Jul 18, 2024

1.7 years ago

Mistral NeMo Instruct

Jul 18, 2024

1.7 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

GPT-4o mini has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2023-10-01, while Mistral NeMo Instruct's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm GPT-4o mini's training data extends to 2023-10-01, but cannot make a direct comparison without Mistral NeMo Instruct's cutoff date.

GPT-4o mini

Oct 2023

Mistral NeMo Instruct

Provider Availability

GPT-4o mini is available from Azure. Mistral NeMo Instruct is available from Google, Mistral AI. The availability of providers can affect quality of the model and reliability.

GPT-4o mini

azure logo
Azure
Input Price:Input: $0.15/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.60/1M

Mistral NeMo Instruct

google logo
Google
Input Price:Input: $0.15/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.15/1M
mistral logo
Mistral
Input Price:Input: $0.15/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.15/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Key Takeaways

Supports multimodal inputs
Higher MMLU score (82.0% vs 68.0%)
Less expensive output tokens
Has open weights

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
OpenAI
GPT-4o mini
Mistral AI
Mistral NeMo Instruct