The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

GPT-4o mini vs o1

o1 leads the LLM Stats Score 20.9 to 3.6. GPT-4o mini is 100.0x cheaper per token.

OpenAI · OpenAI · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

o1 leads the overall LLM Stats Score 20.9 to 3.6, ranking #197 overall.

In the 8 individual benchmarks reported for both models, o1 wins 8; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

On price, GPT-4o mini is roughly 100.0x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.

o1 also accepts a larger context window (200,000 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose GPT-4o mini

  • cost matters — it's about 100.0x cheaper per token

Choose o1

  • overall performance matters — it scores 20.9 and ranks #197 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning — it leads those capability indexes
  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 8 of 8 exact shared results
  • you process long inputs — it offers a 200,000 token context window
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Dec 2024

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Core performance indexes
3.6
#313
20.9
#197
4.1
#303
21.3
#187
-0.6
#250
4.6
#212
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
0 of 8
8 of 8
Input price
$0.15 / M
$15.00 / M
Output price
$0.60 / M
$60.00 / M
Context window
128,000
200,000

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

3 shared
Index
GPT-4o mini
o1
11.4#241
24.0#122
-0.4#190
12.6#103
2.5#150
16.3#86
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

9 reported for GPT-4o mini · 19 for o1

8 shared

GPT-4o mini outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while o1 is better at 8 benchmarks (GPQA, HumanEval, MATH, MathVista, MGSM, MMLU, MMMU, SWE-Bench Verified).

o1 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Sun Sep 27 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

GPT-4o mini costs less

For input processing, GPT-4o mini ($0.15/1M tokens) is 100.0x cheaper than o1 ($15.00/1M tokens).

For output processing, GPT-4o mini ($0.60/1M tokens) is 100.0x cheaper than o1 ($60.00/1M tokens).

In conclusion, o1 is more expensive than GPT-4o mini.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Sun Sep 27 2026 • llm-stats.com
OpenAI
GPT-4o mini
Input tokens$0.15
Output tokens$0.60
Best providerAzure
OpenAI
o1
Input tokens$15.00
Output tokens$60.00
Best providerAzure
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue→

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

o1 accepts 200,000 input tokens compared to GPT-4o mini's 128,000 tokens. o1 can generate longer responses up to 100,000 tokens, while GPT-4o mini is limited to 16,384 tokens.

OpenAI
GPT-4o mini
Input128,000 tokens
Output16,384 tokens
OpenAI
o1
Input200,000 tokens
Output100,000 tokens
Sun Sep 27 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

GPT-4o mini supports multimodal inputs, whereas o1 does not.

GPT-4o mini can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

GPT-4o mini

Text
Images
Audio
Video

o1

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under proprietary licenses.

Both models have usage restrictions defined by their respective organizations.

GPT-4o mini

Proprietary

Closed source

o1

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

GPT-4o mini was released on 2024-07-18, while o1 was released on 2024-12-17.

o1 is 5 months newer than GPT-4o mini.

GPT-4o mini

Jul 18, 2024

2.2 years ago

o1

Dec 17, 2024

1.8 years ago

5mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

GPT-4o mini has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2023-10-01, while o1's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm GPT-4o mini's training data extends to 2023-10-01, but cannot make a direct comparison without o1's cutoff date.

GPT-4o mini

Oct 2023

o1

—

Provider Availability

GPT-4o mini is available from Azure. o1 is available from Azure, OpenAI.

GPT-4o mini

azure logo
Azure
Input Price:Input: $0.15/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.60/1M

o1

azure logo
Azure
Input Price:Input: $15.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $60.00/1M
openai logo
OpenAI
Input Price:Input: $15.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $60.00/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against GPT-4o mini and o1 side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

GPT-4o mini
✓ Preferred
o1
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about GPT-4o mini vs o1.

Which is better, GPT-4o mini or o1?

o1 leads the LLM Stats Score 20.9 to 3.6. GPT-4o mini is made by OpenAI and o1 is made by OpenAI. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does GPT-4o mini compare to o1 in benchmarks?

GPT-4o mini scores HumanEval: 87.2%, MGSM: 87.0%, MMLU: 82.0%, DROP: 79.7%, MATH: 70.2%. o1 scores GSM8k: 97.1%, MATH: 96.4%, GPQA Physics: 92.8%, MMLU: 91.8%, MGSM: 89.3%.

Is GPT-4o mini cheaper than o1?

GPT-4o mini is 100.0x cheaper for input tokens. GPT-4o mini costs $0.15/M input and $0.60/M output via azure. o1 costs $15.00/M input and $60.00/M output via azure.

What are the context window sizes for GPT-4o mini and o1?

GPT-4o mini supports 128K tokens and o1 supports 200K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between GPT-4o mini and o1?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (3.6 vs 20.9), context window (128K vs 200K), input pricing ($0.15 vs $15.00/M), multimodal support (yes vs no). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.