Model Comparison

GPT-5.2 vs Claude Sonnet 4.6

Both models are evenly matched across the benchmarks. GPT-5.2 is 1.2x cheaper per token.

Want to compare interactively?Try the playground

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

10 benchmarks

GPT-5.2 outperforms in 5 benchmarks (GPQA, MMMLU, MMMU-Pro, SWE-Bench Verified, Tau2 Telecom), while Claude Sonnet 4.6 is better at 5 benchmarks (ARC-AGI v2, BrowseComp, Humanity's Last Exam, MCP Atlas, Tau2 Retail).

Both models are evenly matched across the benchmarks.

Fri Apr 10 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

GPT-5.2 costs less

For input processing, GPT-5.2 ($1.75/1M tokens) is 1.7x cheaper than Claude Sonnet 4.6 ($3.00/1M tokens).

For output processing, GPT-5.2 ($14.00/1M tokens) is 1.1x cheaper than Claude Sonnet 4.6 ($15.00/1M tokens).

In conclusion, Claude Sonnet 4.6 is more expensive than GPT-5.2.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Fri Apr 10 2026 • llm-stats.com
OpenAI
GPT-5.2
Input tokens$1.75
Output tokens$14.00
Best providerOpenAI
Anthropic
Claude Sonnet 4.6
Input tokens$3.00
Output tokens$15.00
Best providerAnthropic
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue→

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

GPT-5.2 accepts 400,000 input tokens compared to Claude Sonnet 4.6's 200,000 tokens. GPT-5.2 can generate longer responses up to 128,000 tokens, while Claude Sonnet 4.6 is limited to 64,000 tokens.

OpenAI
GPT-5.2
Input400,000 tokens
Output128,000 tokens
Anthropic
Claude Sonnet 4.6
Input200,000 tokens
Output64,000 tokens
Fri Apr 10 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Both GPT-5.2 and Claude Sonnet 4.6 support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

GPT-5.2

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Claude Sonnet 4.6

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under proprietary licenses.

Both models have usage restrictions defined by their respective organizations.

GPT-5.2

Proprietary

Closed source

Claude Sonnet 4.6

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

GPT-5.2 was released on 2025-12-11, while Claude Sonnet 4.6 was released on 2026-02-17.

Claude Sonnet 4.6 is 2 months newer than GPT-5.2.

GPT-5.2

Dec 11, 2025

4 months ago

Claude Sonnet 4.6

Feb 17, 2026

1 months ago

2mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

GPT-5.2 has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2025-08-25, while Claude Sonnet 4.6's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm GPT-5.2's training data extends to 2025-08-25, but cannot make a direct comparison without Claude Sonnet 4.6's cutoff date.

GPT-5.2

Aug 2025

Claude Sonnet 4.6

—

Provider Availability

GPT-5.2 is available from OpenAI. Claude Sonnet 4.6 is available from Anthropic.

GPT-5.2

openai logo
OpenAI
Input Price:Input: $1.75/1MOutput Price:Output: $14.00/1M

Claude Sonnet 4.6

anthropic logo
Anthropic
Input Price:Input: $3.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $15.00/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Key Takeaways

OpenAI
Larger context window (400,000 tokens)
Less expensive input tokens
Less expensive output tokens
Higher GPQA score (92.4% vs 89.9%)
Higher MMMLU score (89.6% vs 89.3%)
Higher MMMU-Pro score (79.5% vs 75.6%)
Higher SWE-Bench Verified score (80.0% vs 79.6%)
Higher Tau2 Telecom score (98.7% vs 97.9%)
Anthropic
Higher ARC-AGI v2 score (58.3% vs 52.9%)
Higher BrowseComp score (74.7% vs 65.8%)
Higher Humanity's Last Exam score (49.0% vs 34.5%)
Higher MCP Atlas score (61.3% vs 60.6%)
Higher Tau2 Retail score (91.7% vs 82.0%)

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
OpenAI
GPT-5.2
Anthropic
Claude Sonnet 4.6

FAQ

Common questions about GPT-5.2 vs Claude Sonnet 4.6

Both models are evenly matched across the benchmarks. GPT-5.2 is made by OpenAI and Claude Sonnet 4.6 is made by Anthropic. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.
GPT-5.2 scores AIME 2025: 100.0%, HMMT 2025: 99.4%, Tau2 Telecom: 98.7%, Graphwalks BFS <128k: 94.0%, GPQA: 92.4%. Claude Sonnet 4.6 scores Tau2 Telecom: 97.9%, Tau2 Retail: 91.7%, GPQA: 89.9%, MMMLU: 89.3%, SWE-Bench Verified: 79.6%.
GPT-5.2 is 1.7x cheaper for input tokens. GPT-5.2 costs $1.75/M input and $14.00/M output via openai. Claude Sonnet 4.6 costs $3.00/M input and $15.00/M output via anthropic.
GPT-5.2 supports 400K tokens and Claude Sonnet 4.6 supports 200K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.
Key differences include context window (400K vs 200K), input pricing ($1.75 vs $3.00/M). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.
GPT-5.2 is developed by OpenAI and Claude Sonnet 4.6 is developed by Anthropic.