Model Comparison
GPT-5.2 vs Qwen3 VL 30B A3B ThinkingWhich is better in 2026?
GPT-5.2 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking is 12.1x cheaper per token.
Verdict: GPT-5.2 vs Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking — which is better?
GPT-5.2 (by OpenAI) and Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking (by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team) are two of the AI models people compare most. Here is how they stack up on benchmarks, price and capabilities, and which one to pick in 2026.
GPT-5.2 outperforms in 6 benchmarks (AIME 2025, CharXiv-R, GPQA, MMMU-Pro, ScreenSpot Pro, VideoMMMU), while Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking is better at 0 benchmarks. GPT-5.2 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.
On price, Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking is roughly 12.1x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.
GPT-5.2 also accepts a larger context window (400,000 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.
Choose GPT-5.2 if…
- you want the strongest raw capability — it leads on 6 of 6 shared benchmarks
- you process long inputs — it offers a 400,000 token context window
- you want the most recent training data — it shipped Dec 2025
Choose Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking if…
- cost matters — it's about 12.1x cheaper per token
- you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune
Performance Benchmarks
Comparative analysis across standard metrics
GPT-5.2 outperforms in 6 benchmarks (AIME 2025, CharXiv-R, GPQA, MMMU-Pro, ScreenSpot Pro, VideoMMMU), while Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking is better at 0 benchmarks.
GPT-5.2 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.
Arena Performance
Human preference votes
Pricing Analysis
Price comparison per million tokens
For input processing, GPT-5.2 ($1.75/1M tokens) is 8.8x more expensive than Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking ($0.20/1M tokens).
For output processing, GPT-5.2 ($14.00/1M tokens) is 14.1x more expensive than Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking ($0.99/1M tokens).
In conclusion, GPT-5.2 is more expensive than Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking.*
* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens
Context Window
Maximum input and output token capacity
GPT-5.2 accepts 400,000 input tokens compared to Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking's 131,072 tokens. GPT-5.2 can generate longer responses up to 128,000 tokens, while Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking is limited to 32,768 tokens.
Input Capabilities
Supported data types and modalities
Both GPT-5.2 and Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking support multimodal inputs.
They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.
GPT-5.2
Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking
License
Usage and distribution terms
GPT-5.2 is licensed under a proprietary license, while Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking uses Apache 2.0.
License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.
Proprietary
Closed source
Apache 2.0
Open weights
Release Timeline
When each model was launched
GPT-5.2 was released on 2025-12-11, while Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking was released on 2025-09-22.
GPT-5.2 is 3 months newer than Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking.
Dec 11, 2025
5 months ago
2mo newerSep 22, 2025
8 months ago
Knowledge Cutoff
When training data ends
GPT-5.2 has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2025-08-25, while Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking's cutoff date is not specified.
We can confirm GPT-5.2's training data extends to 2025-08-25, but cannot make a direct comparison without Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking's cutoff date.
Aug 2025
—
Provider Availability
GPT-5.2 is available from OpenAI. Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking is available from Novita, DeepInfra.
GPT-5.2
Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking
Outputs Comparison
Key Takeaways
GPT-5.2
View detailsOpenAI
Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking
View detailsAlibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Detailed Comparison
| Feature | | |
|---|
FAQ
Common questions about GPT-5.2 vs Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking.