GPT-5.3 Chat vs GPT OSS 120B
GPT-5.3 Chat and GPT OSS 120B are closely matched at 29.6 and 28.9 on the LLM Stats Score. GPT OSS 120B is 68.5x cheaper per token.
OpenAI · OpenAI · Updated for 2026
Which is better?
GPT-5.3 Chat and GPT OSS 120B are closely matched on the overall LLM Stats Score at 29.6 and 28.9.
In the 2 individual benchmarks reported for both models, GPT OSS 120B wins 2; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.
On price, GPT OSS 120B is roughly 68.5x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.
GPT OSS 120B also accepts a larger context window (131,072 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.
Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.
Choose GPT-5.3 Chat
- you want the most recent training data — it shipped Mar 2026
Choose GPT OSS 120B
- you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 2 of 2 exact shared results
- cost matters — it's about 68.5x cheaper per token
- you process long inputs — it offers a 131,072 token context window
- you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune
At a glance
The differences that matter most.
Individual benchmarks
2 reported for GPT-5.3 Chat · 7 for GPT OSS 120B
GPT-5.3 Chat outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while GPT OSS 120B is better at 2 benchmarks (HealthBench, HealthBench Hard).
GPT OSS 120B significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.
Human preference
Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores
Pricing Analysis
Price comparison per million tokens
For input processing, GPT-5.3 Chat ($1.75/1M tokens) is 47.3x more expensive than GPT OSS 120B ($0.04/1M tokens).
For output processing, GPT-5.3 Chat ($14.00/1M tokens) is 82.4x more expensive than GPT OSS 120B ($0.17/1M tokens).
In conclusion, GPT-5.3 Chat is more expensive than GPT OSS 120B.*
* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens
Context Window
Maximum input and output token capacity
GPT OSS 120B accepts 131,072 input tokens compared to GPT-5.3 Chat's 128,000 tokens. GPT OSS 120B can generate longer responses up to 131,072 tokens, while GPT-5.3 Chat is limited to 16,384 tokens.
Input capabilities
Documented input modalities across available providers
GPT-5.3 Chat supports multimodal inputs, whereas GPT OSS 120B does not.
GPT-5.3 Chat can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.
GPT-5.3 Chat
GPT OSS 120B
License
Usage and distribution terms
GPT-5.3 Chat is licensed under a proprietary license, while GPT OSS 120B uses Apache 2.0.
License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.
Proprietary
Closed source
Apache 2.0
Open weights
Release Timeline
When each model was launched
GPT-5.3 Chat was released on 2026-03-04, while GPT OSS 120B was released on 2025-08-05.
GPT-5.3 Chat is 7 months newer than GPT OSS 120B.
Mar 4, 2026
6 months ago
7mo newerAug 5, 2025
1.1 years ago
Knowledge Cutoff
When training data ends
GPT-5.3 Chat has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2025-08-31, while GPT OSS 120B's cutoff date is not specified.
We can confirm GPT-5.3 Chat's training data extends to 2025-08-31, but cannot make a direct comparison without GPT OSS 120B's cutoff date.
Aug 2025
—
Provider Availability
GPT-5.3 Chat is available from OpenAI. GPT OSS 120B is available from DeepInfra, Novita, OpenAI, Fireworks, Groq.
GPT-5.3 Chat
GPT OSS 120B
Outputs Comparison
Judge for yourself.
Run your own prompts against GPT-5.3 Chat and GPT OSS 120B side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.
FAQ
Common questions about GPT-5.3 Chat vs GPT OSS 120B.