The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

GPT-5.5 vs Muse Ember

GPT-5.5 and Muse Ember are closely matched at 46.7 and 45.9 on the LLM Stats Score. Muse Ember is 56.3x cheaper per token.

OpenAI · Meta · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

GPT-5.5 and Muse Ember are closely matched on the overall LLM Stats Score at 46.7 and 45.9.

On price, Muse Ember is roughly 56.3x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.

GPT-5.5 also accepts a larger context window (1,050,000 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose GPT-5.5

  • you process long inputs — it offers a 1,050,000 token context window

Choose Muse Ember

  • cost matters — it's about 56.3x cheaper per token
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Nov 2026

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Core performance indexes
46.7
#43
45.9
#47
46.5
#35
48.1
#24
34.5
#39
27.3
#86
30.1
#51
31.6
#45
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
—
—
Input price
$5.00 / M
$0.10 / M
Output price
$30.00 / M
$0.50 / M
Context window
1,050,000
1,048,576

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

3 shared
Index
GPT-5.5
Muse Ember
35.3#15
23.4#78
27.1#37
30.7#14
31.6#30
23.6#74
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

28 reported for GPT-5.5 · 6 for Muse Ember

No common benchmarks found

GPT-5.5 and Muse Emberdon't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Muse Ember costs less

For input processing, GPT-5.5 ($5.00/1M tokens) is 50.0x more expensive than Muse Ember ($0.10/1M tokens).

For output processing, GPT-5.5 ($30.00/1M tokens) is 60.0x more expensive than Muse Ember ($0.50/1M tokens).

In conclusion, GPT-5.5 is more expensive than Muse Ember.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Thu Nov 12 2026 • llm-stats.com
OpenAI
GPT-5.5
Input tokens$5.00
Output tokens$30.00
Best providerOpenAI
Meta
Muse Ember
Input tokens$0.10
Output tokens$0.50
Best providerMeta
Notice missing or incorrect data?

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

GPT-5.5 accepts 1,050,000 input tokens compared to Muse Ember's 1,048,576 tokens. Muse Ember can generate longer responses up to 524,288 tokens, while GPT-5.5 is limited to 128,000 tokens.

OpenAI
GPT-5.5
Input1,050,000 tokens
Output128,000 tokens
Meta
Muse Ember
Input1,048,576 tokens
Output524,288 tokens
Thu Nov 12 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Both GPT-5.5 and Muse Ember support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

GPT-5.5

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Muse Ember

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under proprietary licenses.

Both models have usage restrictions defined by their respective organizations.

GPT-5.5

Proprietary

Closed source

Muse Ember

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

GPT-5.5 was released on 2026-04-23, while Muse Ember was released on 2026-11-09.

Muse Ember is 7 months newer than GPT-5.5.

GPT-5.5

Apr 23, 2026

6 months ago

Muse Ember

Nov 9, 2026

3 days ago

6mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

GPT-5.5 has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2025-12-01, while Muse Ember's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm GPT-5.5's training data extends to 2025-12-01, but cannot make a direct comparison without Muse Ember's cutoff date.

GPT-5.5

Dec 2025

Muse Ember

—

Provider Availability

GPT-5.5 is available from OpenAI. Muse Ember is available from Meta Model API.

GPT-5.5

openai logo
OpenAI
Input Price:Input: $5.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $30.00/1M

Muse Ember

meta logo
Meta
Input Price:Input: $0.10/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.50/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against GPT-5.5 and Muse Ember side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

GPT-5.5
✓ Preferred
Muse Ember
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about GPT-5.5 vs Muse Ember.

Which is better, GPT-5.5 or Muse Ember?

GPT-5.5 and Muse Ember are closely matched on the LLM Stats Score at 46.7 and 45.9. GPT-5.5 is made by OpenAI and Muse Ember is made by Meta. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does GPT-5.5 compare to Muse Ember in benchmarks?

GPT-5.5 scores Tau2 Telecom: 98.0%, ARC-AGI: 95.0%, GPQA: 93.6%, ARC-AGI v2: 85.0%, GDPval-MM: 84.9%. Muse Ember scores PerceptionBench: 80.6%, OSWorld 2.1 (partial): 69.5%, Agents' Last Exam: 61.6%, Personal Superintelligence Index: 46.8%, Terminal-Bench 4.0: 40.9%.

Is GPT-5.5 cheaper than Muse Ember?

Muse Ember is 50.0x cheaper for input tokens. GPT-5.5 costs $5.00/M input and $30.00/M output via openai. Muse Ember costs $0.10/M input and $0.50/M output via meta.

What are the context window sizes for GPT-5.5 and Muse Ember?

GPT-5.5 supports 1.1M tokens and Muse Ember supports 1.0M tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between GPT-5.5 and Muse Ember?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (46.7 vs 45.9), context window (1.1M vs 1.0M), input pricing ($5.00 vs $0.10/M). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes GPT-5.5 and Muse Ember?

GPT-5.5 is developed by OpenAI and Muse Ember is developed by Meta.