The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

GPT-5.6 Terra vs Ling 3.0 Flash Fin

GPT-5.6 Terra and Ling 3.0 Flash Fin are closely matched at 50.8 and 43.2 on the LLM Stats Score. Ling 3.0 Flash Fin is 50.0x cheaper per token.

OpenAI · InclusionAI · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

GPT-5.6 Terra and Ling 3.0 Flash Fin are closely matched on the overall LLM Stats Score at 50.8 and 43.2.

On price, Ling 3.0 Flash Fin is roughly 50.0x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.

GPT-5.6 Terra also accepts a larger context window (1,050,000 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose GPT-5.6 Terra

  • you process long inputs — it offers a 1,050,000 token context window

Choose Ling 3.0 Flash Fin

  • cost matters — it's about 50.0x cheaper per token
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Sep 2026

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

GPT-5.6 Terra
OpenAI
Ling 3.0 Flash Fin
InclusionAI
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
50.8
#15
43.2
#41
Reasoning
49.2
#15
44.6
#33
Agents
38.2
#10
29.5
#36
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
—
—
Input price
$2.00 / M
$0.06 / M
Output price
$12.00 / M
$0.18 / M
Context window
1,050,000
262,144

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

2 shared
Index
GPT-5.6 Terra
Ling 3.0 Flash Fin
Tool use
30.2#19
20.4#57
Finance
9.4#147
36.7#5
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

45 reported for GPT-5.6 Terra · 6 for Ling 3.0 Flash Fin

No common benchmarks found

GPT-5.6 Terra and Ling 3.0 Flash Findon't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Ling 3.0 Flash Fin costs less

For input processing, GPT-5.6 Terra ($2.00/1M tokens) is 33.3x more expensive than Ling 3.0 Flash Fin ($0.06/1M tokens).

For output processing, GPT-5.6 Terra ($12.00/1M tokens) is 66.7x more expensive than Ling 3.0 Flash Fin ($0.18/1M tokens).

In conclusion, GPT-5.6 Terra is more expensive than Ling 3.0 Flash Fin.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Mon Sep 14 2026 • llm-stats.com
OpenAI
GPT-5.6 Terra
Input tokens$2.00
Output tokens$12.00
Best providerOpenAI
InclusionAI
Ling 3.0 Flash Fin
Input tokens$0.06
Output tokens$0.18
Best providerDeepinfra
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue→

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

GPT-5.6 Terra accepts 1,050,000 input tokens compared to Ling 3.0 Flash Fin's 262,144 tokens. Ling 3.0 Flash Fin can generate longer responses up to 262,144 tokens, while GPT-5.6 Terra is limited to 128,000 tokens.

OpenAI
GPT-5.6 Terra
Input1,050,000 tokens
Output128,000 tokens
InclusionAI
Ling 3.0 Flash Fin
Input262,144 tokens
Output262,144 tokens
Mon Sep 14 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

GPT-5.6 Terra supports multimodal inputs, whereas Ling 3.0 Flash Fin does not.

GPT-5.6 Terra can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

GPT-5.6 Terra

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Ling 3.0 Flash Fin

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

GPT-5.6 Terra was released on 2026-07-09, while Ling 3.0 Flash Fin was released on 2026-09-03.

Ling 3.0 Flash Fin is 2 months newer than GPT-5.6 Terra.

GPT-5.6 Terra

Jul 9, 2026

2 months ago

Ling 3.0 Flash Fin

Sep 3, 2026

1 weeks ago

1mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

GPT-5.6 Terra has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2026-02-16, while Ling 3.0 Flash Fin's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm GPT-5.6 Terra's training data extends to 2026-02-16, but cannot make a direct comparison without Ling 3.0 Flash Fin's cutoff date.

GPT-5.6 Terra

Feb 2026

Ling 3.0 Flash Fin

—

Provider Availability

GPT-5.6 Terra is available from OpenAI. Ling 3.0 Flash Fin is available from DeepInfra.

GPT-5.6 Terra

openai logo
OpenAI
Input Price:Input: $2.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $12.00/1M

Ling 3.0 Flash Fin

deepinfra logo
Deepinfra
Input Price:Input: $0.06/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.18/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against GPT-5.6 Terra and Ling 3.0 Flash Fin side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

GPT-5.6 Terra
✓ Preferred
Ling 3.0 Flash Fin
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about GPT-5.6 Terra vs Ling 3.0 Flash Fin.

Which is better, GPT-5.6 Terra or Ling 3.0 Flash Fin?

GPT-5.6 Terra and Ling 3.0 Flash Fin are closely matched on the LLM Stats Score at 50.8 and 43.2. GPT-5.6 Terra is made by OpenAI and Ling 3.0 Flash Fin is made by InclusionAI. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does GPT-5.6 Terra compare to Ling 3.0 Flash Fin in benchmarks?

GPT-5.6 Terra scores Connectors: 100.0%, HealthBench Consensus: 95.1%, Search and Function-Calling: 94.6%, GPQA: 92.9%, Capture-the-Flag Challenges (Internal): 91.8%. Ling 3.0 Flash Fin scores SpreadSheetBench-v1: 86.5%, Finance Agent v1.1: 69.2%, Finance Agent v2: 59.8%, Tau3 Banking: 41.0%, APEX-Agents: 29.2%.

Is GPT-5.6 Terra cheaper than Ling 3.0 Flash Fin?

Ling 3.0 Flash Fin is 33.3x cheaper for input tokens. GPT-5.6 Terra costs $2.00/M input and $12.00/M output via openai. Ling 3.0 Flash Fin costs $0.06/M input and $0.18/M output via deepinfra.

What are the context window sizes for GPT-5.6 Terra and Ling 3.0 Flash Fin?

GPT-5.6 Terra supports 1.1M tokens and Ling 3.0 Flash Fin supports 262K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between GPT-5.6 Terra and Ling 3.0 Flash Fin?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (50.8 vs 43.2), context window (1.1M vs 262K), input pricing ($2.00 vs $0.06/M), multimodal support (yes vs no), licensing (Proprietary vs Unknown). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes GPT-5.6 Terra and Ling 3.0 Flash Fin?

GPT-5.6 Terra is developed by OpenAI and Ling 3.0 Flash Fin is developed by InclusionAI.

Related comparisons