GPT-6 Cyber vs Kimi K3.1 Pro
GPT-6 Cyber and Kimi K3.1 Pro are closely matched at 41.0 and 55.1 on the LLM Stats Score. Kimi K3.1 Pro is 10.0x cheaper per token.
OpenAI · Moonshot AI · Updated for 2026
Which is better?
GPT-6 Cyber and Kimi K3.1 Pro are closely matched on the overall LLM Stats Score at 41.0 and 55.1.
In the 1 individual benchmarks reported for both models, GPT-6 Cyber wins 1; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.
On price, Kimi K3.1 Pro is roughly 10.0x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.
GPT-6 Cyber also accepts a larger context window (1,050,000 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.
Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.
Choose GPT-6 Cyber
- you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 1 of 1 exact shared results
- you process long inputs — it offers a 1,050,000 token context window
- you want the most recent training data — it shipped Nov 2026
Choose Kimi K3.1 Pro
- cost matters — it's about 10.0x cheaper per token
- you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune
At a glance
The differences that matter most.
Individual benchmarks
1 reported for GPT-6 Cyber · 30 for Kimi K3.1 Pro
GPT-6 Cyber outperforms in 1 benchmarks (ExploitGym), while Kimi K3.1 Pro is better at 0 benchmarks.
GPT-6 Cyber significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.
Human preference
Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores
Pricing Analysis
Price comparison per million tokens
For input processing, GPT-6 Cyber ($20.00/1M tokens) is 10.0x more expensive than Kimi K3.1 Pro ($2.00/1M tokens).
For output processing, GPT-6 Cyber ($100.00/1M tokens) is 10.0x more expensive than Kimi K3.1 Pro ($10.00/1M tokens).
In conclusion, GPT-6 Cyber is more expensive than Kimi K3.1 Pro.*
* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens
Context Window
Maximum input and output token capacity
GPT-6 Cyber accepts 1,050,000 input tokens compared to Kimi K3.1 Pro's 1,048,576 tokens. Kimi K3.1 Pro can generate longer responses up to 1,048,576 tokens, while GPT-6 Cyber is limited to 128,000 tokens.
Input capabilities
Documented input modalities across available providers
Both GPT-6 Cyber and Kimi K3.1 Pro support multimodal inputs.
They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.
GPT-6 Cyber
Kimi K3.1 Pro
License
Usage and distribution terms
GPT-6 Cyber is licensed under a proprietary license, while Kimi K3.1 Pro uses Kimi K3.1 Pro License.
License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.
Proprietary
Closed source
Kimi K3.1 Pro License
Open weights
Release Timeline
When each model was launched
GPT-6 Cyber was released on 2026-11-05, while Kimi K3.1 Pro was released on 2026-10-23.
GPT-6 Cyber is 0 month newer than Kimi K3.1 Pro.
Nov 5, 2026
5 days ago
1w newerOct 23, 2026
2 weeks ago
Knowledge Cutoff
When training data ends
Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.
Unable to compare the recency of their training data.
Provider Availability
GPT-6 Cyber is available from OpenAI. Kimi K3.1 Pro is available from Fireworks, Moonshot AI, Together.
GPT-6 Cyber
Kimi K3.1 Pro
Outputs Comparison
Judge for yourself.
Run your own prompts against GPT-6 Cyber and Kimi K3.1 Pro side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.
FAQ
Common questions about GPT-6 Cyber vs Kimi K3.1 Pro.