The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

GPT-6 Cyber vs QvQ-72B-Preview

GPT-6 Cyber leads the LLM Stats Score 40.8 to 7.5.

OpenAI · Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

GPT-6 Cyber leads the overall LLM Stats Score 40.8 to 7.5, ranking #82 overall.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose GPT-6 Cyber

  • overall performance matters — it scores 40.8 and ranks #82 on LLM Stats
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Nov 2026

Choose QvQ-72B-Preview

  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Core performance indexes
40.8
#82
7.5
#329
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
—
—
Input price
$20.00 / M
— / M
Output price
$100.00 / M
— / M
Context window
1,050,000
—

Individual benchmarks

1 reported for GPT-6 Cyber · 4 for QvQ-72B-Preview

No common benchmarks found

GPT-6 Cyber and QvQ-72B-Previewdon't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only GPT-6 Cyber specifies input context (1,050,000 tokens). Only GPT-6 Cyber specifies output context (128,000 tokens).

OpenAI
GPT-6 Cyber
Input1,050,000 tokens
Output128,000 tokens
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
QvQ-72B-Preview
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Thu Nov 12 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Both GPT-6 Cyber and QvQ-72B-Preview support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

GPT-6 Cyber

Text
Images
Audio
Video

QvQ-72B-Preview

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

GPT-6 Cyber is licensed under a proprietary license, while QvQ-72B-Preview uses Qwen.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

GPT-6 Cyber

Proprietary

Closed source

QvQ-72B-Preview

Qwen

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

GPT-6 Cyber was released on 2026-11-05, while QvQ-72B-Preview was released on 2024-12-25.

GPT-6 Cyber is 23 months newer than QvQ-72B-Preview.

GPT-6 Cyber

Nov 5, 2026

1 weeks ago

1.9yr newer
QvQ-72B-Preview

Dec 25, 2024

1.9 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against GPT-6 Cyber and QvQ-72B-Preview side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

GPT-6 Cyber
✓ Preferred
QvQ-72B-Preview
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about GPT-6 Cyber vs QvQ-72B-Preview.

Which is better, GPT-6 Cyber or QvQ-72B-Preview?

GPT-6 Cyber leads the LLM Stats Score 40.8 to 7.5. GPT-6 Cyber is made by OpenAI and QvQ-72B-Preview is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does GPT-6 Cyber compare to QvQ-72B-Preview in benchmarks?

GPT-6 Cyber scores ExploitGym: 48.5%. QvQ-72B-Preview scores MathVista: 71.4%, MMMU: 70.3%, MathVision: 35.9%, OlympiadBench: 20.4%.

What are the context window sizes for GPT-6 Cyber and QvQ-72B-Preview?

GPT-6 Cyber supports 1.1M tokens and QvQ-72B-Preview supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between GPT-6 Cyber and QvQ-72B-Preview?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (40.8 vs 7.5), licensing (Proprietary vs Qwen). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes GPT-6 Cyber and QvQ-72B-Preview?

GPT-6 Cyber is developed by OpenAI and QvQ-72B-Preview is developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team.