The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Muse Ember vs QvQ-72B-Preview

Muse Ember leads the LLM Stats Score 45.9 to 7.5.

Meta · Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Muse Ember leads the overall LLM Stats Score 45.9 to 7.5, ranking #47 overall.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Muse Ember

  • overall performance matters — it scores 45.9 and ranks #47 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning — it leads those capability indexes
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Nov 2026

Choose QvQ-72B-Preview

  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Muse Ember
Meta
QvQ-72B-Preview
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
45.9
#47
7.5
#329
Reasoning
48.1
#24
7.7
#321
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
—
—
Input price
$0.10 / M
— / M
Output price
$0.50 / M
— / M
Context window
1,048,576
—

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

2 shared
Index
Muse Ember
QvQ-72B-Preview
Vision
23.4#78
6.0#180
Multimodal
23.6#74
9.3#146
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

6 reported for Muse Ember · 4 for QvQ-72B-Preview

No common benchmarks found

Muse Ember and QvQ-72B-Previewdon't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Muse Ember specifies input context (1,048,576 tokens). Only Muse Ember specifies output context (524,288 tokens).

Meta
Muse Ember
Input1,048,576 tokens
Output524,288 tokens
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
QvQ-72B-Preview
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Thu Nov 12 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Both Muse Ember and QvQ-72B-Preview support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

Muse Ember

Text
Images
Audio
Video

QvQ-72B-Preview

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Muse Ember is licensed under a proprietary license, while QvQ-72B-Preview uses Qwen.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Muse Ember

Proprietary

Closed source

QvQ-72B-Preview

Qwen

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Muse Ember was released on 2026-11-09, while QvQ-72B-Preview was released on 2024-12-25.

Muse Ember is 23 months newer than QvQ-72B-Preview.

Muse Ember

Nov 9, 2026

3 days ago

1.9yr newer
QvQ-72B-Preview

Dec 25, 2024

1.9 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Muse Ember and QvQ-72B-Preview side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Muse Ember
✓ Preferred
QvQ-72B-Preview
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Muse Ember vs QvQ-72B-Preview.

Which is better, Muse Ember or QvQ-72B-Preview?

Muse Ember leads the LLM Stats Score 45.9 to 7.5. Muse Ember is made by Meta and QvQ-72B-Preview is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Muse Ember compare to QvQ-72B-Preview in benchmarks?

Muse Ember scores PerceptionBench: 80.6%, OSWorld 2.1 (partial): 69.5%, Agents' Last Exam: 61.6%, Personal Superintelligence Index: 46.8%, Terminal-Bench 4.0: 40.9%. QvQ-72B-Preview scores MathVista: 71.4%, MMMU: 70.3%, MathVision: 35.9%, OlympiadBench: 20.4%.

What are the context window sizes for Muse Ember and QvQ-72B-Preview?

Muse Ember supports 1.0M tokens and QvQ-72B-Preview supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Muse Ember and QvQ-72B-Preview?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (45.9 vs 7.5), licensing (Proprietary vs Qwen). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Muse Ember and QvQ-72B-Preview?

Muse Ember is developed by Meta and QvQ-72B-Preview is developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team.

Related comparisons