The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

GPT-6 Cyber vs Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct

GPT-6 Cyber leads the LLM Stats Score 41.0 to 9.4.

OpenAI · Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

GPT-6 Cyber leads the overall LLM Stats Score 41.0 to 9.4, ranking #79 overall.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose GPT-6 Cyber

  • overall performance matters — it scores 41.0 and ranks #79 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes coding and agents — it leads those capability indexes
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Nov 2026

Choose Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct

  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

GPT-6 Cyber
OpenAI
Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
41.0
#79
9.4
#310
Coding
33.5
#46
12.2
#180
Agents
31.2
#47
-3.4
#220
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
—
—
Input price
$20.00 / M
— / M
Output price
$100.00 / M
— / M
Context window
1,050,000
—

Individual benchmarks

1 reported for GPT-6 Cyber · 28 for Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct

No common benchmarks found

GPT-6 Cyber and Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instructdon't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only GPT-6 Cyber specifies input context (1,050,000 tokens). Only GPT-6 Cyber specifies output context (128,000 tokens).

OpenAI
GPT-6 Cyber
Input1,050,000 tokens
Output128,000 tokens
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Tue Nov 10 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Both GPT-6 Cyber and Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

GPT-6 Cyber

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

GPT-6 Cyber is licensed under a proprietary license, while Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

GPT-6 Cyber

Proprietary

Closed source

Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

GPT-6 Cyber was released on 2026-11-05, while Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct was released on 2025-02-28.

GPT-6 Cyber is 21 months newer than Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct.

GPT-6 Cyber

Nov 5, 2026

4 days ago

1.7yr newer
Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct

Feb 28, 2025

1.7 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against GPT-6 Cyber and Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

GPT-6 Cyber
✓ Preferred
Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about GPT-6 Cyber vs Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct.

Which is better, GPT-6 Cyber or Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct?

GPT-6 Cyber leads the LLM Stats Score 41.0 to 9.4. GPT-6 Cyber is made by OpenAI and Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does GPT-6 Cyber compare to Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct in benchmarks?

GPT-6 Cyber scores ExploitGym: 48.5%. Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct scores DocVQA: 94.8%, Android Control Low_EM: 93.3%, HumanEval: 91.5%, ScreenSpot: 88.5%, MBPP: 84.0%.

What are the context window sizes for GPT-6 Cyber and Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct?

GPT-6 Cyber supports 1.1M tokens and Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between GPT-6 Cyber and Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (41.0 vs 9.4), licensing (Proprietary vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes GPT-6 Cyber and Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct?

GPT-6 Cyber is developed by OpenAI and Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct is developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team.

Related comparisons