The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

GPT-6 Cyber vs SWE-2 Flash

GPT-6 Cyber and SWE-2 Flash are closely matched at 40.8 and 43.8 on the LLM Stats Score.

OpenAI · Cognition · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

GPT-6 Cyber and SWE-2 Flash are closely matched on the overall LLM Stats Score at 40.8 and 43.8.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose GPT-6 Cyber

  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Nov 2026

Choose SWE-2 Flash

  • you are already invested in the Cognition ecosystem

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

GPT-6 Cyber
OpenAI
SWE-2 Flash
Cognition
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
40.8
#82
43.8
#59
Coding
32.7
#47
33.0
#44
Agents
30.5
#49
30.1
#50
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
—
—
Input price
$20.00 / M
— / M
Output price
$100.00 / M
— / M
Context window
1,050,000
—

Individual benchmarks

1 reported for GPT-6 Cyber · 7 for SWE-2 Flash

No common benchmarks found

GPT-6 Cyber and SWE-2 Flashdon't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only GPT-6 Cyber specifies input context (1,050,000 tokens). Only GPT-6 Cyber specifies output context (128,000 tokens).

OpenAI
GPT-6 Cyber
Input1,050,000 tokens
Output128,000 tokens
Cognition
SWE-2 Flash
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Thu Nov 12 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

GPT-6 Cyber supports multimodal inputs, whereas SWE-2 Flash does not.

GPT-6 Cyber can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

GPT-6 Cyber

Text
Images
Audio
Video

SWE-2 Flash

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under proprietary licenses.

Both models have usage restrictions defined by their respective organizations.

GPT-6 Cyber

Proprietary

Closed source

SWE-2 Flash

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

GPT-6 Cyber was released on 2026-11-05, while SWE-2 Flash was released on 2026-11-04.

GPT-6 Cyber is 0 month newer than SWE-2 Flash.

GPT-6 Cyber

Nov 5, 2026

1 weeks ago

1d newer
SWE-2 Flash

Nov 4, 2026

1 weeks ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against GPT-6 Cyber and SWE-2 Flash side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

GPT-6 Cyber
✓ Preferred
SWE-2 Flash
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about GPT-6 Cyber vs SWE-2 Flash.

Which is better, GPT-6 Cyber or SWE-2 Flash?

GPT-6 Cyber and SWE-2 Flash are closely matched on the LLM Stats Score at 40.8 and 43.8. GPT-6 Cyber is made by OpenAI and SWE-2 Flash is made by Cognition. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does GPT-6 Cyber compare to SWE-2 Flash in benchmarks?

GPT-6 Cyber scores ExploitGym: 48.5%. SWE-2 Flash scores Terminal-Bench 2.1: 89.2%, DeepSWE 1.1: 60.1%, SWE Atlas - Codebase QnA: 50.0%, FrontierCode 1.1: 45.5%, ExploitBench: 34.8%.

What are the context window sizes for GPT-6 Cyber and SWE-2 Flash?

GPT-6 Cyber supports 1.1M tokens and SWE-2 Flash supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between GPT-6 Cyber and SWE-2 Flash?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (40.8 vs 43.8), multimodal support (yes vs no). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes GPT-6 Cyber and SWE-2 Flash?

GPT-6 Cyber is developed by OpenAI and SWE-2 Flash is developed by Cognition.

Related comparisons