GPT-6 Luna vs MiniMax M1 80K
GPT-6 Luna leads the LLM Stats Score 44.5 to 21.4. GPT-6 Luna is 4.8x cheaper per token.
OpenAI · MiniMax · Updated for 2026
Which is better?
GPT-6 Luna leads the overall LLM Stats Score 44.5 to 21.4, ranking #40 overall.
On price, GPT-6 Luna is roughly 4.8x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.
GPT-6 Luna also accepts a larger context window (1,050,000 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.
Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.
Choose GPT-6 Luna
- overall performance matters — it scores 44.5 and ranks #40 on LLM Stats
- your work emphasizes reasoning and coding — it leads those capability indexes
- cost matters — it's about 4.8x cheaper per token
- you process long inputs — it offers a 1,050,000 token context window
- you want the most recent training data — it shipped Sep 2026
Choose MiniMax M1 80K
- you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune
At a glance
The differences that matter most.
Capability indexes
Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks
Individual benchmarks
5 reported for GPT-6 Luna · 16 for MiniMax M1 80K
GPT-6 Luna and MiniMax M1 80Kdon't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.
Human preference
Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores
Pricing Analysis
Price comparison per million tokens
For input processing, GPT-6 Luna ($0.10/1M tokens) is 5.5x cheaper than MiniMax M1 80K ($0.55/1M tokens).
For output processing, GPT-6 Luna ($0.50/1M tokens) is 4.4x cheaper than MiniMax M1 80K ($2.20/1M tokens).
In conclusion, MiniMax M1 80K is more expensive than GPT-6 Luna.*
* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens
Context Window
Maximum input and output token capacity
GPT-6 Luna accepts 1,050,000 input tokens compared to MiniMax M1 80K's 1,000,000 tokens. GPT-6 Luna can generate longer responses up to 128,000 tokens, while MiniMax M1 80K is limited to 40,000 tokens.
Input capabilities
Documented input modalities across available providers
GPT-6 Luna supports multimodal inputs, whereas MiniMax M1 80K does not.
GPT-6 Luna can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.
GPT-6 Luna
MiniMax M1 80K
License
Usage and distribution terms
GPT-6 Luna is licensed under a proprietary license, while MiniMax M1 80K uses MIT.
License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.
Proprietary
Closed source
MIT
Open weights
Release Timeline
When each model was launched
GPT-6 Luna was released on 2026-09-22, while MiniMax M1 80K was released on 2025-06-16.
GPT-6 Luna is 15 months newer than MiniMax M1 80K.
Sep 22, 2026
0 days ago
1.3yr newerJun 16, 2025
1.3 years ago
Knowledge Cutoff
When training data ends
GPT-6 Luna has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2026-05-18, while MiniMax M1 80K's cutoff date is not specified.
We can confirm GPT-6 Luna's training data extends to 2026-05-18, but cannot make a direct comparison without MiniMax M1 80K's cutoff date.
May 2026
—
Provider Availability
GPT-6 Luna is available from OpenAI. MiniMax M1 80K is available from Novita.
GPT-6 Luna
MiniMax M1 80K
Outputs Comparison
Judge for yourself.
Run your own prompts against GPT-6 Luna and MiniMax M1 80K side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.
FAQ
Common questions about GPT-6 Luna vs MiniMax M1 80K.