The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

MiMo-V2.6-Flash vs MiniMax M1 80K

MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads the LLM Stats Score 45.7 to 21.4.

Xiaomi · MiniMax · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads the overall LLM Stats Score 45.7 to 21.4, ranking #29 overall.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose MiMo-V2.6-Flash

  • overall performance matters — it scores 45.7 and ranks #29 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning and coding — it leads those capability indexes
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Sep 2026

Choose MiniMax M1 80K

  • you want predictable pricing at $0.55/M input and $2.20/M output

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Core performance indexes
45.7
#29
21.4
#191
43.2
#42
21.6
#179
36.6
#21
9.5
#174
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
Input price
— / M
$0.55 / M
Output price
— / M
$2.20 / M
Context window
1,000,000

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

1 shared
Index
MiMo-V2.6-Flash
MiniMax M1 80K
28.1#22
14.6#96
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

16 reported for MiMo-V2.6-Flash · 16 for MiniMax M1 80K

No common benchmarks found

MiMo-V2.6-Flash and MiniMax M1 80Kdon't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

147.0B diff

MiniMax M1 80K has 147.0B more parameters than MiMo-V2.6-Flash, making it 47.6% larger.

Xiaomi
MiMo-V2.6-Flash
309.0Bparameters
MiniMax
MiniMax M1 80K
456.0Bparameters
309.0B
MiMo-V2.6-Flash
456.0B
MiniMax M1 80K

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only MiniMax M1 80K specifies input context (1,000,000 tokens). Only MiniMax M1 80K specifies output context (40,000 tokens).

Xiaomi
MiMo-V2.6-Flash
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
MiniMax
MiniMax M1 80K
Input1,000,000 tokens
Output40,000 tokens
Tue Sep 22 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

MiMo-V2.6-Flash supports multimodal inputs, whereas MiniMax M1 80K does not.

MiMo-V2.6-Flash can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

MiMo-V2.6-Flash

Text
Images
Audio
Video

MiniMax M1 80K

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under MIT.

Both models share the same licensing terms, providing consistent usage rights.

MiMo-V2.6-Flash

MIT

Open weights

MiniMax M1 80K

MIT

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

MiMo-V2.6-Flash was released on 2026-09-22, while MiniMax M1 80K was released on 2025-06-16.

MiMo-V2.6-Flash is 15 months newer than MiniMax M1 80K.

MiMo-V2.6-Flash

Sep 22, 2026

-1 days ago

1.3yr newer
MiniMax M1 80K

Jun 16, 2025

1.3 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against MiMo-V2.6-Flash and MiniMax M1 80K side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

MiMo-V2.6-Flash
✓ Preferred
MiniMax M1 80K
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about MiMo-V2.6-Flash vs MiniMax M1 80K.

Which is better, MiMo-V2.6-Flash or MiniMax M1 80K?

MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads the LLM Stats Score 45.7 to 21.4. MiMo-V2.6-Flash is made by Xiaomi and MiniMax M1 80K is made by MiniMax. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does MiMo-V2.6-Flash compare to MiniMax M1 80K in benchmarks?

MiMo-V2.6-Flash scores CyberGym: 95.1%, Terminal-Bench 2.1: 87.6%, OSWorld-Verified: 80.8%, MiMo Cyber Bench: 77.2%, Toolathlon-Verified: 73.6%. MiniMax M1 80K scores MATH-500: 96.8%, ZebraLogic: 86.8%, AIME 2024: 86.0%, MMLU-Pro: 81.1%, AIME 2025: 76.9%.

What are the context window sizes for MiMo-V2.6-Flash and MiniMax M1 80K?

MiMo-V2.6-Flash supports an unknown number of tokens and MiniMax M1 80K supports 1.0M tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between MiMo-V2.6-Flash and MiniMax M1 80K?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (45.7 vs 21.4), multimodal support (yes vs no). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes MiMo-V2.6-Flash and MiniMax M1 80K?

MiMo-V2.6-Flash is developed by Xiaomi and MiniMax M1 80K is developed by MiniMax.