The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

GPT-6 Rosalind vs Mercury 3

Comparing GPT-6 Rosalind and Mercury 3 across benchmarks, pricing, and capabilities.

OpenAI · Inception · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

GPT-6 Rosalind and Mercury 3 trade strengths across price, capabilities, and technical limits. The better choice depends on the workload.

On price, Mercury 3 is roughly 184.6x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose GPT-6 Rosalind

  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Oct 2026

Choose Mercury 3

  • cost matters — it's about 184.6x cheaper per token

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Benchmark wins
—
—
Input price
$15.00 / M
$0.10 / M
Output price
$75.00 / M
$0.35 / M
Context window
—
1,000,000

Individual benchmarks

0 reported for GPT-6 Rosalind · 12 for Mercury 3

No common benchmarks found

GPT-6 Rosalind and Mercury 3don't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Mercury 3 costs less

For input processing, GPT-6 Rosalind ($15.00/1M tokens) is 150.0x more expensive than Mercury 3 ($0.10/1M tokens).

For output processing, GPT-6 Rosalind ($75.00/1M tokens) is 214.3x more expensive than Mercury 3 ($0.35/1M tokens).

In conclusion, GPT-6 Rosalind is more expensive than Mercury 3.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Wed Nov 04 2026 • llm-stats.com
OpenAI
GPT-6 Rosalind
Input tokens$15.00
Output tokens$75.00
Best providerOpenAI
Inception
Mercury 3
Input tokens$0.10
Output tokens$0.35
Best providerInception
Notice missing or incorrect data?

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Mercury 3 specifies input context (1,000,000 tokens). Only Mercury 3 specifies output context (131,072 tokens).

OpenAI
GPT-6 Rosalind
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Inception
Mercury 3
Input1,000,000 tokens
Output131,072 tokens
Wed Nov 04 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

GPT-6 Rosalind supports multimodal inputs, whereas Mercury 3 does not.

GPT-6 Rosalind can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

GPT-6 Rosalind

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Mercury 3

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under proprietary licenses.

Both models have usage restrictions defined by their respective organizations.

GPT-6 Rosalind

Proprietary

Closed source

Mercury 3

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

GPT-6 Rosalind was released on 2026-10-30, while Mercury 3 was released on 2026-10-19.

GPT-6 Rosalind is 0 month newer than Mercury 3.

GPT-6 Rosalind

Oct 30, 2026

5 days ago

1w newer
Mercury 3

Oct 19, 2026

2 weeks ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Provider Availability

GPT-6 Rosalind is available from OpenAI. Mercury 3 is available from Inception.

GPT-6 Rosalind

openai logo
OpenAI
Input Price:Input: $15.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $75.00/1M

Mercury 3

inception logo
Inception
Input Price:Input: $0.10/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.35/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against GPT-6 Rosalind and Mercury 3 side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

GPT-6 Rosalind
✓ Preferred
Mercury 3
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about GPT-6 Rosalind vs Mercury 3.

Which is better, GPT-6 Rosalind or Mercury 3?

GPT-6 Rosalind (OpenAI) and Mercury 3 (Inception) each have strengths in different areas. Compare their benchmark scores, pricing, context windows, and capabilities above to determine which fits your needs.

How does GPT-6 Rosalind compare to Mercury 3 in benchmarks?

Mercury 3 scores GPQA: 89.2%, AA-LCR: 77.7%, IFBench: 76.8%, MRCR v2: 75.5%, DeepSearchQA: 71.3%.

Is GPT-6 Rosalind cheaper than Mercury 3?

Mercury 3 is 150.0x cheaper for input tokens. GPT-6 Rosalind costs $15.00/M input and $75.00/M output via openai. Mercury 3 costs $0.10/M input and $0.35/M output via inception.

What are the context window sizes for GPT-6 Rosalind and Mercury 3?

GPT-6 Rosalind supports an unknown number of tokens and Mercury 3 supports 1.0M tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between GPT-6 Rosalind and Mercury 3?

Key differences include input pricing ($15.00 vs $0.10/M), multimodal support (yes vs no). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes GPT-6 Rosalind and Mercury 3?

GPT-6 Rosalind is developed by OpenAI and Mercury 3 is developed by Inception.