The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

GPT-6 Rosalind vs Muse Spark 1.3

Comparing GPT-6 Rosalind and Muse Spark 1.3 across benchmarks, pricing, and capabilities.

OpenAI · Meta · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

GPT-6 Rosalind and Muse Spark 1.3 trade strengths across price, capabilities, and technical limits. The better choice depends on the workload.

On price, Muse Spark 1.3 is roughly 15.0x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose GPT-6 Rosalind

  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Oct 2026

Choose Muse Spark 1.3

  • cost matters — it's about 15.0x cheaper per token

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Benchmark wins
—
—
Input price
$15.00 / M
$1.25 / M
Output price
$75.00 / M
$4.25 / M
Context window
—
1,048,576

Individual benchmarks

0 reported for GPT-6 Rosalind · 11 for Muse Spark 1.3

No common benchmarks found

GPT-6 Rosalind and Muse Spark 1.3don't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Muse Spark 1.3 costs less

For input processing, GPT-6 Rosalind ($15.00/1M tokens) is 12.0x more expensive than Muse Spark 1.3 ($1.25/1M tokens).

For output processing, GPT-6 Rosalind ($75.00/1M tokens) is 17.6x more expensive than Muse Spark 1.3 ($4.25/1M tokens).

In conclusion, GPT-6 Rosalind is more expensive than Muse Spark 1.3.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Mon Nov 02 2026 • llm-stats.com
OpenAI
GPT-6 Rosalind
Input tokens$15.00
Output tokens$75.00
Best providerOpenAI
Meta
Muse Spark 1.3
Input tokens$1.25
Output tokens$4.25
Best providerMeta
Notice missing or incorrect data?

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Muse Spark 1.3 specifies input context (1,048,576 tokens). Only Muse Spark 1.3 specifies output context (943,718 tokens).

OpenAI
GPT-6 Rosalind
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Meta
Muse Spark 1.3
Input1,048,576 tokens
Output943,718 tokens
Mon Nov 02 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Both GPT-6 Rosalind and Muse Spark 1.3 support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

GPT-6 Rosalind

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Muse Spark 1.3

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under proprietary licenses.

Both models have usage restrictions defined by their respective organizations.

GPT-6 Rosalind

Proprietary

Closed source

Muse Spark 1.3

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

GPT-6 Rosalind was released on 2026-10-30, while Muse Spark 1.3 was released on 2026-09-02.

GPT-6 Rosalind is 2 months newer than Muse Spark 1.3.

GPT-6 Rosalind

Oct 30, 2026

3 days ago

1mo newer
Muse Spark 1.3

Sep 2, 2026

2 months ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Provider Availability

GPT-6 Rosalind is available from OpenAI. Muse Spark 1.3 is available from Meta Model API.

GPT-6 Rosalind

openai logo
OpenAI
Input Price:Input: $15.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $75.00/1M

Muse Spark 1.3

meta logo
Meta
Input Price:Input: $1.25/1MOutput Price:Output: $4.25/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against GPT-6 Rosalind and Muse Spark 1.3 side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

GPT-6 Rosalind
✓ Preferred
Muse Spark 1.3
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about GPT-6 Rosalind vs Muse Spark 1.3.

Which is better, GPT-6 Rosalind or Muse Spark 1.3?

GPT-6 Rosalind (OpenAI) and Muse Spark 1.3 (Meta) each have strengths in different areas. Compare their benchmark scores, pricing, context windows, and capabilities above to determine which fits your needs.

How does GPT-6 Rosalind compare to Muse Spark 1.3 in benchmarks?

Muse Spark 1.3 scores MRCR v2 (8-needle): 98.5%, MRCR v2 (8-needle, 512K-1M): 98.1%, DeepSearchQA: 89.4%, Terminal-Bench 2.1: 88.8%, DeepSWE 1.1: 75.4%.

Is GPT-6 Rosalind cheaper than Muse Spark 1.3?

Muse Spark 1.3 is 12.0x cheaper for input tokens. GPT-6 Rosalind costs $15.00/M input and $75.00/M output via openai. Muse Spark 1.3 costs $1.25/M input and $4.25/M output via meta.

What are the context window sizes for GPT-6 Rosalind and Muse Spark 1.3?

GPT-6 Rosalind supports an unknown number of tokens and Muse Spark 1.3 supports 1.0M tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between GPT-6 Rosalind and Muse Spark 1.3?

Key differences include input pricing ($15.00 vs $1.25/M). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes GPT-6 Rosalind and Muse Spark 1.3?

GPT-6 Rosalind is developed by OpenAI and Muse Spark 1.3 is developed by Meta.