The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

GPT-6.1 Terra vs QwQ-32B

GPT-6.1 Terra leads the LLM Stats Score 47.5 to 14.2.

OpenAI · Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

GPT-6.1 Terra leads the overall LLM Stats Score 47.5 to 14.2, ranking #36 overall.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose GPT-6.1 Terra

  • overall performance matters — it scores 47.5 and ranks #36 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning and coding — it leads those capability indexes
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Oct 2026

Choose QwQ-32B

  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

GPT-6.1 Terra
OpenAI
QwQ-32B
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
47.5
#36
14.2
#269
Reasoning
49.0
#19
15.1
#258
Coding
37.1
#30
10.1
#194
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
—
—
Input price
$1.00 / M
— / M
Output price
$5.00 / M
— / M
Context window
1,050,000
—

Individual benchmarks

8 reported for GPT-6.1 Terra · 7 for QwQ-32B

No common benchmarks found

GPT-6.1 Terra and QwQ-32Bdon't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only GPT-6.1 Terra specifies input context (1,050,000 tokens). Only GPT-6.1 Terra specifies output context (128,000 tokens).

OpenAI
GPT-6.1 Terra
Input1,050,000 tokens
Output128,000 tokens
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
QwQ-32B
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Sat Oct 31 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

GPT-6.1 Terra supports multimodal inputs, whereas QwQ-32B does not.

GPT-6.1 Terra can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

GPT-6.1 Terra

Text
Images
Audio
Video

QwQ-32B

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

GPT-6.1 Terra is licensed under a proprietary license, while QwQ-32B uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

GPT-6.1 Terra

Proprietary

Closed source

QwQ-32B

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

GPT-6.1 Terra was released on 2026-10-26, while QwQ-32B was released on 2025-03-05.

GPT-6.1 Terra is 20 months newer than QwQ-32B.

GPT-6.1 Terra

Oct 26, 2026

4 days ago

1.6yr newer
QwQ-32B

Mar 5, 2025

1.7 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

GPT-6.1 Terra has a knowledge cutoff of 2026-06-01, while QwQ-32B has a cutoff of 2024-11-28.

GPT-6.1 Terra has more recent training data (up to 2026-06-01), making it potentially better informed about events through that date compared to QwQ-32B (2024-11-28).

GPT-6.1 Terra

Jun 2026

1.6 yr newer
QwQ-32B

Nov 2024

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against GPT-6.1 Terra and QwQ-32B side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

GPT-6.1 Terra
✓ Preferred
QwQ-32B
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about GPT-6.1 Terra vs QwQ-32B.

Which is better, GPT-6.1 Terra or QwQ-32B?

GPT-6.1 Terra leads the LLM Stats Score 47.5 to 14.2. GPT-6.1 Terra is made by OpenAI and QwQ-32B is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does GPT-6.1 Terra compare to QwQ-32B in benchmarks?

GPT-6.1 Terra scores HealthBench Consensus: 95.1%, HealthBench Professional: 62.7%, Agents' Last Exam: 60.0%, Terminal-Bench-Science 0.1: 58.3%, MentalHealthBench: 55.5%. QwQ-32B scores MATH-500: 90.6%, IFEval: 83.9%, AIME 2024: 79.5%, LiveBench: 73.1%, BFCL: 66.4%.

What are the context window sizes for GPT-6.1 Terra and QwQ-32B?

GPT-6.1 Terra supports 1.1M tokens and QwQ-32B supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between GPT-6.1 Terra and QwQ-32B?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (47.5 vs 14.2), multimodal support (yes vs no), licensing (Proprietary vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes GPT-6.1 Terra and QwQ-32B?

GPT-6.1 Terra is developed by OpenAI and QwQ-32B is developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team.

Related comparisons