The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

MiniMax M3.1 Flash vs QwQ-32B

MiniMax M3.1 Flash leads the LLM Stats Score 48.7 to 14.3.

MiniMax · Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

MiniMax M3.1 Flash leads the overall LLM Stats Score 48.7 to 14.3, ranking #29 overall.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose MiniMax M3.1 Flash

  • overall performance matters — it scores 48.7 and ranks #29 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning and coding — it leads those capability indexes
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Oct 2026

Choose QwQ-32B

  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Core performance indexes
48.7
#29
14.3
#258
45.9
#32
15.1
#248
37.9
#23
10.1
#187
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
—
—
Input price
$0.15 / M
— / M
Output price
$0.60 / M
— / M
Context window
1,000,000
—

Individual benchmarks

15 reported for MiniMax M3.1 Flash · 7 for QwQ-32B

No common benchmarks found

MiniMax M3.1 Flash and QwQ-32Bdon't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only MiniMax M3.1 Flash specifies input context (1,000,000 tokens). Only MiniMax M3.1 Flash specifies output context (524,288 tokens).

MiniMax
MiniMax M3.1 Flash
Input1,000,000 tokens
Output524,288 tokens
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
QwQ-32B
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Fri Oct 23 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

MiniMax M3.1 Flash supports multimodal inputs, whereas QwQ-32B does not.

MiniMax M3.1 Flash can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

MiniMax M3.1 Flash

Text
Images
Audio
Video

QwQ-32B

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

MiniMax M3.1 Flash is licensed under a proprietary license, while QwQ-32B uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

MiniMax M3.1 Flash

Proprietary

Closed source

QwQ-32B

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

MiniMax M3.1 Flash was released on 2026-10-19, while QwQ-32B was released on 2025-03-05.

MiniMax M3.1 Flash is 20 months newer than QwQ-32B.

MiniMax M3.1 Flash

Oct 19, 2026

0 days ago

1.6yr newer
QwQ-32B

Mar 5, 2025

1.6 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

QwQ-32B has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2024-11-28, while MiniMax M3.1 Flash's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm QwQ-32B's training data extends to 2024-11-28, but cannot make a direct comparison without MiniMax M3.1 Flash's cutoff date.

MiniMax M3.1 Flash

—

QwQ-32B

Nov 2024

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against MiniMax M3.1 Flash and QwQ-32B side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

MiniMax M3.1 Flash
✓ Preferred
QwQ-32B
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about MiniMax M3.1 Flash vs QwQ-32B.

Which is better, MiniMax M3.1 Flash or QwQ-32B?

MiniMax M3.1 Flash leads the LLM Stats Score 48.7 to 14.3. MiniMax M3.1 Flash is made by MiniMax and QwQ-32B is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does MiniMax M3.1 Flash compare to QwQ-32B in benchmarks?

MiniMax M3.1 Flash scores BabyVision: 91.0%, CharXiv-R: 82.5%, CyberGym: 82.2%, BankerToolBench: 76.2%, DeepSWE 1.1: 73.7%. QwQ-32B scores MATH-500: 90.6%, IFEval: 83.9%, AIME 2024: 79.5%, LiveBench: 73.1%, BFCL: 66.4%.

What are the context window sizes for MiniMax M3.1 Flash and QwQ-32B?

MiniMax M3.1 Flash supports 1.0M tokens and QwQ-32B supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between MiniMax M3.1 Flash and QwQ-32B?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (48.7 vs 14.3), multimodal support (yes vs no), licensing (Proprietary vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes MiniMax M3.1 Flash and QwQ-32B?

MiniMax M3.1 Flash is developed by MiniMax and QwQ-32B is developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team.