The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

GPT OSS 120B High vs Ling 3.0 Flash Fin

Ling 3.0 Flash Fin leads the LLM Stats Score 43.3 to 25.5. Ling 3.0 Flash Fin is 2.2x cheaper per token.

OpenAI · InclusionAI · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Ling 3.0 Flash Fin leads the overall LLM Stats Score 43.3 to 25.5, ranking #39 overall.

On price, Ling 3.0 Flash Fin is roughly 2.2x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.

Ling 3.0 Flash Fin also accepts a larger context window (262,144 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose GPT OSS 120B High

  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

Choose Ling 3.0 Flash Fin

  • overall performance matters — it scores 43.3 and ranks #39 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning and agents — it leads those capability indexes
  • cost matters — it's about 2.2x cheaper per token
  • you process long inputs — it offers a 262,144 token context window
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Sep 2026

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

GPT OSS 120B High
OpenAI
Ling 3.0 Flash Fin
InclusionAI
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
25.5
#155
43.3
#39
Reasoning
25.7
#148
44.7
#32
Agents
3.1
#161
29.5
#35
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
—
—
Input price
$0.10 / M
$0.06 / M
Output price
$0.50 / M
$0.18 / M
Context window
131,072
262,144

Individual benchmarks

7 reported for GPT OSS 120B High · 6 for Ling 3.0 Flash Fin

No common benchmarks found

GPT OSS 120B High and Ling 3.0 Flash Findon't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Ling 3.0 Flash Fin costs less

For input processing, GPT OSS 120B High ($0.10/1M tokens) is 1.7x more expensive than Ling 3.0 Flash Fin ($0.06/1M tokens).

For output processing, GPT OSS 120B High ($0.50/1M tokens) is 2.8x more expensive than Ling 3.0 Flash Fin ($0.18/1M tokens).

In conclusion, GPT OSS 120B High is more expensive than Ling 3.0 Flash Fin.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Tue Sep 08 2026 • llm-stats.com
OpenAI
GPT OSS 120B High
Input tokens$0.10
Output tokens$0.50
Best providerOpenAI
InclusionAI
Ling 3.0 Flash Fin
Input tokens$0.06
Output tokens$0.18
Best providerDeepinfra
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue→

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

7.2B diff

Ling 3.0 Flash Fin has 7.2B more parameters than GPT OSS 120B High, making it 6.2% larger.

OpenAI
GPT OSS 120B High
116.8Bparameters
InclusionAI
Ling 3.0 Flash Fin
124.0Bparameters
116.8B
GPT OSS 120B High
124.0B
Ling 3.0 Flash Fin

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Ling 3.0 Flash Fin accepts 262,144 input tokens compared to GPT OSS 120B High's 131,072 tokens. Ling 3.0 Flash Fin can generate longer responses up to 262,144 tokens, while GPT OSS 120B High is limited to 131,072 tokens.

OpenAI
GPT OSS 120B High
Input131,072 tokens
Output131,072 tokens
InclusionAI
Ling 3.0 Flash Fin
Input262,144 tokens
Output262,144 tokens
Tue Sep 08 2026 • llm-stats.com

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

GPT OSS 120B High was released on 2025-08-05, while Ling 3.0 Flash Fin was released on 2026-09-03.

Ling 3.0 Flash Fin is 13 months newer than GPT OSS 120B High.

GPT OSS 120B High

Aug 5, 2025

1.1 years ago

Ling 3.0 Flash Fin

Sep 3, 2026

5 days ago

1.1yr newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Provider Availability

GPT OSS 120B High is available from OpenAI, Fireworks. Ling 3.0 Flash Fin is available from DeepInfra.

GPT OSS 120B High

openai logo
OpenAI
Input Price:Input: $0.10/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.50/1M
fireworks logo
Fireworks
Input Price:Input: $0.15/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.60/1M

Ling 3.0 Flash Fin

deepinfra logo
Deepinfra
Input Price:Input: $0.06/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.18/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against GPT OSS 120B High and Ling 3.0 Flash Fin side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

GPT OSS 120B High
✓ Preferred
Ling 3.0 Flash Fin
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about GPT OSS 120B High vs Ling 3.0 Flash Fin.

Which is better, GPT OSS 120B High or Ling 3.0 Flash Fin?

Ling 3.0 Flash Fin leads the LLM Stats Score 43.3 to 25.5. GPT OSS 120B High is made by OpenAI and Ling 3.0 Flash Fin is made by InclusionAI. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does GPT OSS 120B High compare to Ling 3.0 Flash Fin in benchmarks?

GPT OSS 120B High scores AIME 2025: 92.5%, MMMLU: 83.8%, LiveCodeBench v6: 81.9%, GPQA: 80.9%, MMLU-Pro: 80.7%. Ling 3.0 Flash Fin scores SpreadSheetBench-v1: 86.5%, Finance Agent v1.1: 69.2%, Finance Agent v2: 59.8%, Tau3 Banking: 41.0%, APEX-Agents: 29.2%.

Is GPT OSS 120B High cheaper than Ling 3.0 Flash Fin?

Ling 3.0 Flash Fin is 1.7x cheaper for input tokens. GPT OSS 120B High costs $0.10/M input and $0.50/M output via openai. Ling 3.0 Flash Fin costs $0.06/M input and $0.18/M output via deepinfra.

What are the context window sizes for GPT OSS 120B High and Ling 3.0 Flash Fin?

GPT OSS 120B High supports 131K tokens and Ling 3.0 Flash Fin supports 262K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between GPT OSS 120B High and Ling 3.0 Flash Fin?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (25.5 vs 43.3), context window (131K vs 262K), input pricing ($0.10 vs $0.06/M), licensing (Apache 2.0 vs Unknown). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes GPT OSS 120B High and Ling 3.0 Flash Fin?

GPT OSS 120B High is developed by OpenAI and Ling 3.0 Flash Fin is developed by InclusionAI.

Related comparisons