The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

GPT-Rosalind vs Ling 3.1 Flash

Ling 3.1 Flash leads the LLM Stats Score 51.0 to 31.6.

OpenAI · InclusionAI · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Ling 3.1 Flash leads the overall LLM Stats Score 51.0 to 31.6, ranking #15 overall.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose GPT-Rosalind

  • you want predictable pricing at $5.00/M input and $25.00/M output

Choose Ling 3.1 Flash

  • overall performance matters — it scores 51.0 and ranks #15 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning — it leads those capability indexes
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Sep 2026

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

GPT-Rosalind
OpenAI
Ling 3.1 Flash
InclusionAI
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
31.6
#126
51.0
#15
Reasoning
31.0
#126
47.5
#26
Agents
21.6
#72
38.0
#12
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
—
—
Input price
$5.00 / M
— / M
Output price
$25.00 / M
— / M
Context window
—
—

Individual benchmarks

10 reported for GPT-Rosalind · 11 for Ling 3.1 Flash

No common benchmarks found

GPT-Rosalind and Ling 3.1 Flashdon't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

GPT-Rosalind supports multimodal inputs, whereas Ling 3.1 Flash does not.

GPT-Rosalind can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

GPT-Rosalind

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Ling 3.1 Flash

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

GPT-Rosalind was released on 2026-09-11, while Ling 3.1 Flash was released on 2026-09-30.

Ling 3.1 Flash is 1 month newer than GPT-Rosalind.

GPT-Rosalind

Sep 11, 2026

3 weeks ago

Ling 3.1 Flash

Sep 30, 2026

1 weeks ago

2w newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against GPT-Rosalind and Ling 3.1 Flash side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

GPT-Rosalind
✓ Preferred
Ling 3.1 Flash
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about GPT-Rosalind vs Ling 3.1 Flash.

Which is better, GPT-Rosalind or Ling 3.1 Flash?

Ling 3.1 Flash leads the LLM Stats Score 51.0 to 31.6. GPT-Rosalind is made by OpenAI and Ling 3.1 Flash is made by InclusionAI. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does GPT-Rosalind compare to Ling 3.1 Flash in benchmarks?

GPT-Rosalind scores Biorisk knowledge: 81.1%, Labwork Bench: 63.2%, LifeSciBench: 57.6%, TroubleshootingBench: 53.3%, Multi-select Virology Troubleshooting: 51.2%. Ling 3.1 Flash scores CyberGym: 87.9%, DRACO: 85.5%, FrontierSWE: 75.2%, Multi-Challenge: 69.8%, SkillsBench: 68.7%.

What are the main differences between GPT-Rosalind and Ling 3.1 Flash?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (31.6 vs 51.0), multimodal support (yes vs no), licensing (Proprietary vs Unknown). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes GPT-Rosalind and Ling 3.1 Flash?

GPT-Rosalind is developed by OpenAI and Ling 3.1 Flash is developed by InclusionAI.

Related comparisons